Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 1082 


 
Table of Contents   
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 1-26
Cholestatic liver disease: Practice guidelines from the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation


1 Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Hepatobiliary Sciences and Liver Transplantation, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4 Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Pediatrics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
6 Department of Liver and Small Bowel Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
7 Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, King Fahd Military Complex, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
8 Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission27-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance16-May-2021
Date of Web Publication27-Jul-2021
 

   Abstract 


Cholestatic liver diseases (CLDs) are a group of diseases characterized by jaundice and cholestasis as the main presentation with different complications, which have considerable impact on the liver and can lead to end-stage liver disease, cirrhosis, and liver-related complications. In the last few years, tremendous progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with these conditions. However, several aspects related to the management of CLDs remain deficient and unclear. Due to the lack of recommendations that can help in the management, treatment of those conditions, the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT) has created a task force group to develop guidelines related to CLDs management in order to provide a standard of care for patients in need. These guidelines provide general guidance for health care professionals to optimize medical care for patients with CLDs for both adult and pediatric populations, in association with clinical judgments to be considered on a case-by-case basis. These guidelines describe common CLDs in Saudi Arabia, with recommendations on the best approach for diagnosis and management of different diseases based on the Grading of Recommendation Assessment (GRADE), combined with a level of evidence available in the literature.

Keywords: Cholestasis, cholestatic liver disease, jaundice

How to cite this article:
Mawardi M, Alalwan A, Fallatah H, Abaalkhail F, Hasosah M, Shagrani M, Alghamdi MY, Alghamdi AS. Cholestatic liver disease: Practice guidelines from the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2021;27, Suppl S1:1-26

How to cite this URL:
Mawardi M, Alalwan A, Fallatah H, Abaalkhail F, Hasosah M, Shagrani M, Alghamdi MY, Alghamdi AS. Cholestatic liver disease: Practice guidelines from the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 30];27, Suppl S1:1-26. Available from: https://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2021/27/7/1/322374





   Introduction Top


Cholestatic liver diseases (CLDs) are a group of conditions characterized by jaundice and cholestasis as the main clinical presentation, with several other complications including cirrhosis, variceal bleeding, portal hypertension, etc. Cholestasis is characterized by an elevation in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) or gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), with a decrease in bile flow and increase in bilirubin, which can occur later. They have been reported in both adult and pediatric populations, with considerable impact on the liver tissues leading to end-stage liver disease for most patients. CLDs include a wide range of autoimmune diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and overlap syndromes with different severity.

Considering the lack of universal consensus on the best management approach for CLDs, treatment modalities vary based on the clinicians' experience and the medical facility where treatment is offered. Therefore, a task force initiative under the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT) took place in order to provide CLDs management recommendations for daily clinical practice in Saudi Arabia. These recommendations are intended to guide health care practitioners, in association with clinical judgment, to optimize treatment and endure delivery of care. In addition, these guidelines will be updated on a regular basis following the international literature and guidelines as indicated. Published guidelines from the American Association of Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), were used as main references to provide the recommendations.

Taskforce approach for CLDs management guidelines and recommendations

A panel of eight certified hepatologists with experience in the field of CLDs were asked to evaluate the current literature and develop management guidelines for patients in Saudi Arabia. In total, two pediatric hepatologists who were responsible for the section dealing with pediatric patients and six adult hepatologists, met in February 2020. The panel reviewed all current literature and guidelines of CLD's diagnosis and management, including primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), overlap syndromes, IgG4 cholestatic disease, drug-induced liver cholestasis (DILI-C), and CLDs in pediatric patients. This included published guidelines from the AASLD and EASL.

The task force conducted the review in pairs, in which two hepatologists teamed up and were assigned a specific condition(s). The literature search was conducted independently and in duplicates. Eligible studies were reviewed and graded following the GRADE system [Table 1].[1] Any disagreement between reviewers was resolved by a group discussion to reach an agreement. Data were extracted from eligible studies and assessed for strength of evidence and inclusion in the CLDs management guidelines. The task force panel reviewed the developed guidelines for applicability in the Saudi population.
Table 1: Evidence grading (Adapted from GRADE system)

Click here to view



   Primary Biliary Cholangitis Top


Background

Primary biliary cholangitis is a chronic inflammatory, autoimmune disease that is characterized by cholestatic elevation of liver enzymes associated with positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA). The disease is associated with several clinical manifestations and complications which can progress to cirrhosis. The clinical practice guidelines will provide an evidence-based approach to patients with PBC disease, with the main objective to prevent liver disease progression as well as management of potential complications.

Pathophysiology

PBC is an autoimmune disease that is characterized by positive AMA with bile duct pathology.[2],[3] The disease is associated with multiple environmental as well as genetic factors.[4],[5],[6] AMA can be described as a disease-specified autoantibody which aims at the lipoic acid presented at the 2-OXO dehydrogenase complex in the inner membrane of the mitochondria.[7],[8] The majority of AMA produced by plasma blasts is mainly IgA, which goes through transcytosis at the biliary epithelium as well as affects the liver cell mitochondria. The disease is related to deficiency of humoral tolerance in addition to autoreactive differentiation of clusters of CD4+/CD8+ pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2)–specific T-cells in the liver.[9],[10]

Several environmental factors have been attributed to the disease in large case-control studies, including smoking, hormone replacement, nail polish, and urinary tract infection. No definite association was confirmed, and studies are currently ongoing to define the interactions between genetic and environmental factors.[11],[12],[13]

Epidemiology

Presently, there is no literature about the current prevalence of PBC in Saudi Arabia due to its rarity. The current overall prevalence of the disease worldwide is between 19 and 402 cases per million.[3] In general, the overall prevalence of this disease is increasing, with a women to men ratio of 9:1.[14],[15] The prevalence of positive AMA is unknown worldwide. Several studies from Italy and Japan estimated a prevalence of 0.5% and 0.64%, respectively.[16],[17] PBC is characterized by higher concordance in monozygotic twins than dizygotic twins.[4] Overall, 15% of the disease variability is accounted by genetic factors.[18]

Positive AMA can be present with normal liver function tests and no clinical manifestations.[19] In one study, 5-year occurrence of PBC in these patients was observed to be 16% after 7 years of follow-up.[20] The positive AMA prevalence in PBC patient's first-degree relative (FDR) was higher than in control (13.1% vs. 1%).[21]

Natural History

The survival of patients with PBC is correlated with the histological progression of the disease.[22],[23] Three large studies estimated a median time of 2 years to develop (advanced fibrosis (F3, Metavir) or more in patients without treatment.[23],[24],[25] In a large community-dependent study in the UK, 15% of patients decompensated during 5 years follow-up, where 50% patients at entry had cirrhosis.[26] The esophageal varices' development impacts the survival, with an estimated 3-year survival of 59%.[27] Liver transplantation (LT) work-up should be considered in patients with total bilirubin >6 mg/dL (103 μmol/L) or Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >12. One- and five-year survival is estimated to be 90% and 80%–85%, respectively, in patients who achieve a biochemical response. The risk of disease recurrence is estimated to be 18%.[28],[29]Several factors were associated with recurrent PBC after LT, including young age at the time of transplantation, tacrolimus use, and biochemical markers of cholestasis after transplantation, as was demonstrated in the longest published experience of LT for PBC[30]

Prognostic Models For PBC

Different models have been studied to be used for prognostication for PBC patients. The Yale model was the 1st PBC-specific model which includes serum bilirubin, age, hepatomegaly, and evidence of cirrhosis or fibrosis, which were all independent risk factors for poor prognosis.[22] The major limitation of this model is the requirement of the liver biopsy. The Mayo model was introduced in 1989.[31] Recently, two prognostic models for PBC, the UK-PBC score and the GLOBE score, were validated in a large cohort of studies from multiple centers.

The UK-PBC score was validated in a cohort of 3,165 patients and evaluated multiple parameters including serum bilirubin, aminotransferase, and ALP at 12-months of treatment completion time point, in addition to albumin and platelet counts at baseline, which estimated the risk of liver-related death as well as the need for LT in 5, 10, and 15 years.[32] GLOBE score was developed based on data of 2,488 PBC patients from a large retrospective study who were treated with urso-deoxycholic acid (UDCA). The same parameters are also included in the GLOBE score, in addition to age at the start of treatment, and were assessed following 1-year treatment completion. The study was eventually validated by another cohort of North American and European patients.[33] Both prognostic models are considered superior to previous models but were not validated in other ethnicities such as in Arab populations such as those from Saudi Arabia.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

Numerous studies from Sweden, North America, and the United Kingdom evaluated asymptomatic PBC patients within an average follow-up of 4.5 to 17.8 years. On average, 36% to 89% would develop clinical symptoms with a median time of 2 to 4.2 years from the time of diagnosis to the appearance of symptoms. In addition, the 10-year survival ranged between 50% and 70%. At the same time, symptomatic PBC had a median survival duration ranging between 5 and 8 years starting from PBC symptoms onset.[22],[26],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38]

The diagnosis of PBC requires a systematic approach which starts with taking a comprehensive history as well as physical examination in any patient presenting with abnormal liver function tests, suspicious for cholestatic liver diseases. The classic biochemical abnormality includes an elevation in ALP, serum bilirubin (mainly direct bilirubin), and GGT. In order to assess PBC disease progression and treatment potential, noninvasive markers including ALP and bilirubin were analyzed in different settings and subpopulations, at different times relative to the clinical endpoints, LT, or death, which used as surrogate markers to predict outcomes.[39] Furthermore, there is an increase in levels of immunoglobulins (mainly IgM) in patients with PBC. Since cholestasis is a prominent presentation of PBC, abdominal ultrasound should be the first-line, noninvasive imaging technique for differentiating extra- and intrahepatic cholestasis. In addition, serum AMA levels should be assessed which could be diagnostic in 95% of the PBC patients.[40] Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can be the next imaging of choice in patients with unexplained cholestasis. Following comprehensive evaluation including imaging and serological screening, liver biopsy is indicated in patients suffering from unexplained intrahepatic cholestasis. In the setting of inherited cholestatic syndromes, genetic testing should be considered on a case-by-case basis.



PBC Treatment

Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 13–15 mg/kg/d is the treatment of choice for patients with PBC. The proposed mechanisms of action have to do with the anti cholestatic effect through stimulation of ductular alkaline choleretic, cholangiocyte apoptosis, and bile acid–induced hepatocyte inhibition.[41] Several studies showed a major role of UDCA in improving the laboratory parameters of patients with PBC, including hepatic profile and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels and delaying liver disease's histological progression.[24],[42] As of today, there is no clear-cut evidence of UDCA's role in improving survival. However, recent reports showed favorable and promising effects.[43],[44] In order to assess for UDCA's long-term effect on PBC patients after 1 year of treatment, several prognostic models have been studied and validated: Rochester, Rotterdam, Barcelona, Paris I and II, Toronto, and Ehime and two-continuous criteria, GLOBE and UK-PBC.[45] Of these, the four most commonly used and clinically applicable ones are shown in [Table 2]. The two most recent key trials of second-line therapy in PBC applied either the revised Toronto criteria (POISE) or the Paris-2 criteria for selecting high-risk patients.[46],[47]
Table 2: PBC prognostic scoring systems

Click here to view


The current evidence does not support cortico steroid use in PBC except in overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis.[48],[49] Several studies for the use of synthetic corticosteroids with first-pass metabolism (Budesonide) at a dose of 6–9 mg/d for 9 months were conducted, including cohort patients with suboptimal response to UDCA in early-stage PBC. Laboratory and histological improvement results were controversial. Budesonide is not suggested in cirrhosis patients due to the potential risk of portal vein thrombosis.[50],[51],[52],[53] Further studies are recommended to confirm its long-term benefit, especially in patients with advanced PBC disease.[54]

There is emerging evidence for UDCA use in the prevention of recurrent PBC after transplantation, with a reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, and death. Combining UDCA with cyclosporine was associated with the best outcome[55]

Obeticholic acid

Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a selective farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist which is acquired from the endogenous FXR ligand and the bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid.[56] In comparison to chenodeoxycholic acid, FXR is effectively activated by OCA.[56],[57] Hepatocytes are protected by the FXR signaling against toxicity of bile acid through upregulation of bile acid transporters and synthesis impairment.[58] Additionally, FXR signaling may provide anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects.[59],[60]

The PBC OCA International Study of Efficacy (POISE) phase III clinical trial included patients with PBC who had suboptimal responses to UDCA or intolerance for a year (serum ALP >1.67 ULN and total bilirubin <2 ULN) in comparison to placebo.[47] The OCA group reported a significant decrease in levels of ALP and total bilirubin, compared to baseline, but had more serious adverse events. Furthermore, OCA-treated patients demonstrated a reduction in total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and a slight increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL), within 2 weeks.[47] Non-invasive measures for liver fibrosis patients failed to show a significant difference in both placebo and OCA groups at 12 months. Pruritus was the main side effect found in 38% of the placebo group, 68% of the 10 mg OCA group, and 56% of patients in 5–10 mg OCA group. Up to 10% of patients discontinued OCA treatment due to pruritis.[47]

A randomized clinical trial evaluated the effect of OCA monotherapy and reported a significant change in serum ALP, with a 53.9% reduction in the 10 mg arm as well as a 39.2% reduction in the 5 mg arm; however, no changes in the placebo arm were noted.[61] In addition, serum levels of conjugated bilirubin improved in OCA-treated patients. Similar to POISE trial, the most common side effect reported was pruritus which led to discontinuation of treatment in 35% of subjects in the high-dose group. No benefit of OCA in decompensated cirrhosis has been reported; and due to the risk of worsening liver function, its application in Child-Pugh B and C cirrhosis is not recommended. As of now, the long-term effects of OCA on survival or cardiovascular adverse events is still pending.

Fibrates

Peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR) is a lipid-lowering medication which activates a nuclear receptor and has various roles in metabolic processes including bile acid homeostasis. Based on the current literature, fenofibrate at 160 mg/d for 48 weeks demonstrated a 50% reduction in ALP in patients with no response to UDCA.[62] In addition, in non-responding patients to UDCA monotherapy, a combination of bezafibrate at 400 mg/day with UDCA, showed 67% normalization of ALP and 30% normalization of all liver parameters compared to 0% improvement in the placebo group. Furthermore, fibrates had a useful consequence on fibrosis markers and liver stiffness. Potential adverse events with fibrates use include musculoskeletal pain, elevation in serum creatine, ALT, and AST. Similar to OCA, fibrates are not recommended for decompensated cirrhosis patients.[46]




   Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Top


Background

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic, idiopathic, cholestatic, heterogeneous disease, that involves the bile ducts and liver, which often progress to end-stage liver disease. The disease is characterized by progressive extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts fibrosis, and persistent biliary inflammation, that leads to multifocal bile duct strictures formation, which can affect the entire biliary tree.[63]

Pathophysiology

As of yet, the pathogenic mechanisms behind PSC are not completely understood; however, it is believed to be multifactorial. It is considered an immune-mediated disease associated with other conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Environmental triggers could initiate various adaptive and innate immune system events resulting in progressive fibrosis, cholangiocyte damage, and lymphocyte migration in genetically susceptible people to PSC. These events are typically medicated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA haplotypes in particular DR3, B8, A1, and DQ2. A rise in levels of serum autoantibody is also seen in those patients, with ANA seen in 53%, anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies in 66%, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in 87%.[63],[64],[65]

Epidemiology

The incidence of PSC has been on the rise and is believed to be the same among European and North American countries. Several studies have suggested a PSC incidence rate of 0.5 to 1.3 and prevalence of 3.85 to 16.2 per 100,000 population/year.[66] As of now, epidemiological studies from developing countries are still lacking which may restrict PSC's global incidence and impact.

Clinical Presentation

PSC is more likely to affect males, with the mean age of 40 years. Overall, 20%–40% of patients have no physical abnormalities and are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and elevated ALP levels, PSC diagnosis is often incidentally combined with suggestive findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or MRCP. The most frequent signs at diagnosis are hepatomegaly in 44% and splenomegaly in 39% of patients.[67] Furthermore, pruritus and fatigue are a common presentation in 70% of patients with PSC, similar to other cholestatic liver diseases, with a significant impact on quality of life. In general, pruritus worsens at night in humid and warmer weather with some dermatological complications including skin excoriations.[68] Fatigue is a common symptom, which is still poorly understood and tends to progress as the day goes.[69],[70] Most of these symptoms are likely to remit and then recur spontaneously.

Bacterial cholangitis with recurrent febrile episodes and jaundice have been reported in 10%–15% of patients during the course of PSC. Other clinical presentations may include cirrhosis, liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, and variceal bleeding, which are more likely to occur in progressive disease. In 3.3% of PSC patients, precirrhotic portal hypertension can be detected due to obliterative retinopathy or nodular regenerative hyperplasia.[71] The risk of malignancy is significantly higher in PSC patients in the form of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

Concomitant IBD has been reported in approximately 70% of PSC patients, in which UC represents 13% of cases. At the same time, 5% of patients with IBD are likely to be diagnosed with PSC as well, though, PSC is not related to the IBD course.[72] The incidence of osteoporosis with PSC has been reported at 4%–10%, and correlated with duration of IBD, low body mass index, and older age.[73] In late stage disease, fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, and steatorrhea are more likely to take place due to chronic cholestasis.[74]

There are several subtypes of PSC. Overall, the classic subtype accounts for 90% of cases affecting the whole biliary tree. In 5% of patients, the small intrahepatic bile ducts are affected and known as small duct PSC. In addition, 5% of adults and 35% of children with PSC may experience overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis.[75] Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-positive sclerosing cholangitis is a distinct entity reported in 10% of patients with PSC with more severe disease and rapid progression to liver transplantation in a shorter time duration.[76]

PSC also needs to be differentiated from secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SCC), in which prolonged obstruction of extrahepatic biliary tree results in significant injury to cholangiocytes, causing fibrosing inflammatory destruction of intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic biliary system. SCC patients have a similar picture to PSC with multifocal biliary stricturing process. This phenomenon is associated with several reasons such as blunt or surgical abdominal trauma, intraductal stone disease, recurrent pancreatitis, as well as intra-arterial chemotherapy, leading to long-term biliary obstruction. Other conditions associated with SSC include autoimmune pancreatitis, recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, portal biliopathy, AIDS-related cholangiopathy, primary immune deficiency, as well as eosinophilic and/or mast cell cholangitis.[77]

Diagnosis of PSC

Most patients with PSC are likely to be asymptomatic or present with unspecific symptoms which makes the diagnosis process more challenging. Often, the presence of fatigue, pruritus, and jaundice is suggestive of PSC. Combined with proper imaging, histological and laboratory investigations, the diagnosis of PSC can be ascertained in the presence of cholestatic liver disease. Furthermore, PSC laboratory findings include GGT as well as ALP, which cannot be explained otherwise, in addition to characteristic bile duct abnormalities with segmental dilatations and multifocal strictures, seen by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), ERCP, or MRCP. As part of the investigation process, the levels of IgG4 should be checked for potential elevation in all patients with PSC. Furthermore, the secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis as well as cholestasis of other reasons if present should be ruled out. For patients with small duct PSC, the symptoms are similar to typical PSC but have normal cholangiogram, this type can be confirmed by histopathology. IBD and non-IBD patients with unexplained cholestasis would require further investigation to exclude PSC.[78],[79]

Imaging studies

Even with ERCP being the gold standard for PSC diagnosis, MRCP has been suggested recently as a first-line, noninvasive imaging method with equivalent accuracy and high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (94%). ERCP is considered an invasive imaging technique associated with several adverse events such as bacterial cholangitis and pancreatitis. Yet, ERCP continues to be utilized in daily clinical practice mainly for cases with early-stage PSC limited to the intrahepatic bile duct and if MRCP is contraindicated.[80] Based on the model, comparing various imaging methods in patients with suspected PSC, an initial MRCP imaging, if negative, to be followed by ERCP is currently the most cost-effective approach.[81] The PSC's characteristic cholangiographic findings include annular, short, multifocal strictures between normal or minimal dilated segments, described as a “beaded pattern”.

Liver biopsy

In the presence of accurate imaging techniques, liver biopsies are less likely to add useful diagnostic information and changing the PSC patient management approach. However, it is considered an important workup tool for suspected small duct PSC and potential overlap syndrome. Once obtained, the most characteristic histological feature is periductal concentric “onion-skin” fibrosis which can only be identified in less than 25% of liver biopsies. Furthermore, PSC could have nonspecific histological changes with some degree of similarity to primary biliary cholangitis patients. The degree and severity of hepatic lobules and/or portal triads are commonly utilized for PSC staging similar to PBC.[82],[83]



PSC Treatment

Currently, no effective pharmacological therapy for PSC is available. Immunosuppressants, including corticosteroids, are often considered as treatment options for PSC in the presence of IgG4-associated disease or overlap syndrome. At the same time, moderate histological, biochemical, and clinical improvement have been demonstrated with UDCA only. However, the need for a LT, or risk of CCA and mortality is not significantly associated with UDCA treatment. In addition, it is not recommended for early PSC disease.[84]

For PBC, UDCA has been reported as an effective treatment, whereas its role in managing PSC-related liver diseases is not well recognized. In PSC patients, oral UDCA (13–15 mg/kg/d) has been recommended by EASL as first-line pharmacotherapy life-long, which is not in line with AASLD recommendations advising against UDCA use.[77],[83] As of today, the recommended dosing schedule for UDCA is still not clear, which includes both, a high dose of 30 mg/kg/d and a lower dose of 15–20 mg/kg/d. Based on the current literature, liver chemistry improvements have been observed with higher UDCA dosage (20–30 mg/kg/d) and standard-dosage (8–15 mg/kg/d). Other studies have reported further liver recovery on a histological level. Furthermore, several clinical trials failed to report any significant improvements in clinical endpoints using UDCA in patients with PSC, such as delay in the development of CCA, progression to LT, portal hypertension, cirrhosis, or death.[85] However, a placebo-controlled, double-blind controlled trial involving 150 patients over 5 years was stopped because patients randomly assigned to UDCA at doses of 28-30 mg/kg/d were significantly more likely to reach the primary endpoint of development of cirrhosis, varices, cholangiocarcinoma, need for LT, or death. The reasons for the unexpected outcome in the UDCA group than the placebo group were unclear, but based upon these data, high-dose UDCA should be avoided in PSC patients.[86],[87]In addition, high-dose UDCA was also associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia among patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC.[88]In patients with PSC, common complications such as fatigue, pruritus, and osteoporosis require supportive care. In general, management of cholestasis' underlying cause helps in relieving associated pruritus. In addition, PSC patients with a dominant stricture in bile ducts would benefit from therapeutic interventions. Further details are provided in the section on the management of extrahepatic complications of cholestasis.



Patients with PSC, who developed bacterial cholangitis related to dominant stricture, respond mostly to therapeutic drainage of the obstruction, along with antibiotics. Long-term prophylactic antibiotics are often considered in recurrent bacterial cholangitis, which can be severe, and considered as a primary indication for LT.[89] Due to the lack of effective nonsurgical treatment for PSC and associated complications, more invasive therapy such as endoscopy and liver transplants are commonly considered on a case-by-case basis.

Role of ERCP in Treatment of PSC

In general, ERCP is indicated in PSC patients with significant radiological, laboratory, and/or clinical findings during the course of the disease, with the aim to identify biliary strictures amenable to intervention and to exclude superimposed malignancy. For this purpose, a dominant stricture related to PSC is defined as stenosis ≤1.5 mm in diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) and/or ≤1.0 mm of right (RHD) or left hepatic duct (LHD).[90] During the follow-up period, 45% to 58% of PSC patients may present with dominant stricture and findings suspicious for CCA. Before attempting endoscopic therapy, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), endoscopic biopsy, and/or brush cytology must be performed to exclude the possibility of malignancy.[89]

Major bile ducts subtotal or total stenosis is linked to decreased survival. Repeated endoscopic balloon dilations of dominant stenosis allow the long-term preservation of a functioning common bile duct. The usage of ERCP in managing dominant strictures was investigated in a prospective study that included 171 PSC patients.[91] Study subjects were followed up for 20 years and showed transplant-free survival of 52% at 10 years and 81% at 5 years. In addition, patients with dominant strictures had a 6% CCA rate. Currently, the best therapeutic endoscopic method for PSC is still controversial and includes stent placement, balloon or catheter dilatation, and sphincterotomy. PSC patients with dominant strictures may not benefit from stenting after balloon dilation. Compared to endoscopic dilatation only, an increase in complications associated with biliary stenting has been reported. Hence, this treatment approach should be reserved for strictures refractory to dilatation. Perioperative antibiotics should be considered to avoid any risk of cholangitis precipitated by injecting contrast agents into an obstructed duct.[92] Biliary sphincterotomy is not suggested as a routine procedure before biliary stenting to avoid ascending cholangitis risks. However, it is advised in challenging, and frequent cannulation-requiring procedures.[93]



Liver Transplantation in PSC

Liver transplantation is one treatment approach to manage PSC. Its indication includes poor quality of life, progressive muscle wasting, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intractable ascites, portal hypertensive gastropathy or variceal bleeding, intractable pruritus, CCA, and recurrent cholangitis. The available literature advocates for Roux-en-Y choledocho-jejunostomy following extrahepatic biliary tree's resection to reconstruct the biliary system.[94] Survival rates have been shown to be 93.7%, 92.2%, 86.4%, and 69.8% at 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-years, respectively. Overall, 20%–25% of patients may develop recurrent PSC within 5–10 years after LT.[95] Complications following LT include de-novo IBD occurrence, IBD increased activity, and PSC recurrence.[96]



Inflammatory Bowel Disease and PSC

The clinical presentation and course of PSC combined with IBD varies. In general, colitis tends to be more quiescent or mild with a high rate of pancolitis. IBD can be diagnosed during the course of PSC, and in the majority of patients, it precedes PSC by a median time interval of 10 years. De-novo IBD may take place in post-LT PSC patients. Furthermore, PSC can be detected during the course of IBD and sometimes several years following proctocolectomy. For other patients, IBD and PSC are diagnosed concomitantly.

Patients with active colitis may have a normal colonoscopy with common features of rectal sparing on a biopsy. In cases of UC without PSC, backwash ileitis is infrequent compared to 16.7% in UC patients with PSC. Compared to Crohn's disease (CD) alone, ileocolitis and colitis are more frequent in PSC patients with CD. However, isolated ileal disease is rarely reported (2%–5%) compared to 30% in typical CD.[97],[98] Furthermore, PSC-IBD is identified as a distinctive entity with a high risk of dysplasia and colorectal cancer.

The risk of secondary malignancy has been reported earlier, as 76% of PSC patients with colorectal neoplasia have right-sided distribution. Thus, full colonoscopy is indicated as a standard of care for proper surveillance. Furthermore, IBD patients who received LT should still go through an annual colonoscopy with surveillance biopsies, due to the increased risk of colon cancer. Therefore, surveillance colonoscopy every 1–2 years intervals is recommended in PSC patients with IBD from the time of diagnosis. Patients with no evidence of colitis on their initial screening colonoscopy should undergo a repeat colonoscopy every 3–5 years. If symptoms of colitis emerge earlier, a colonoscopy should be considered.[89],[97]



For patients with both IBD and PSC, the relevant guidelines must be followed for IBD treatment. In UC and PSC patients, UDCA use has been suggested to decrease the risk of colorectal dysplasia; yet, available evidence on its use as a chemo-preventative agent is limited and not suggested on regular basis. PSC patients who received LT would benefit from azathioprine and cyclosporine over tacrolimus, due to a lower rate of de novo disease development and IBD exacerbation. In PSC-IBD patients, proctocolectomy outcome and safety are associated with liver disease severity. In addition, the reconstruction of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after colectomy is related to an increased risk of pouchitis. The decision to pursue ileal pouch-anal anastomosis instead of ileostomy in PSC-IBD is likely to decrease the risk of local perianastomotic varices.[98]

Cholangiocarcinoma and other Hepatobiliary Malignancies

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is defined as an extra- or intrahepatic bile duct cancer with high mortality and 5-years survival of <10% with late diagnosis. Following HCC, CCA is the 2nd most common liver tumor accounting for 10%–15% of all hepatobiliary malignancies. The CCA cumulative incidence ranges between 7% and 14%, with a lifetime incidence of 6%–36%. Its risk factors include biliary cirrhosis, cholestasis, as well as bile duct strictures in PSC. In PSC patients, the risk of CCA is not dependent on disease duration as half of CCA cases are detected within the first year of PSC diagnosis, with an annual incidence of 0.5%–1.5% following the first year. In terms of age, younger PSC subjects are diagnosed with CCA compared to CCA in non-PSC subjects. The role of IBD in PSC prognosis is still unclear. In a retrospective study from Mayo Clinic (Minnesota), a total of 399 PSC patients with IBD were evaluated. It was concluded that prolonged duration of IBD was linked with CCA's increased risks; however, colectomy failed to modify this risk.[99],[100],[101]

Early diagnosis of CCA in PSC patients is challenging, particularly in dominant strictures cases where benign and neoplastic lesions are morphologically similar on radiographic images. In general, CCA associated with PSC confined to the biliary tree's extrahepatic portion is not common (<10%). The diagnosis of CCA in these cases requires imaging studies specifically in the setting of clinical deterioration of weight loss, abdominal pain, and sudden, worsening jaundice, which indicates advanced disease.

In order to facilitate CCA early diagnosis as well as PSC surveillance, long-term assessment of serological biomarkers is recommended. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the main serum biomarker studied and used to diagnose CCA, although increased levels of CA 19-9 are also associated with other hepatic complications. Compared to PSC patients without CCA, patients with CCA tend to present with higher CA19–9 serum levels. Furthermore, a lower CA19–9 level is observed in PSC-related CCA compared to CCA patients without PSC. In order to diagnose CCA in symptomatic patients, a cut-off value of 129 U/mL (normal <55 U/mL) for CA19–9 is used with 98% and 79%, specificity and sensitivity, respectively. However, 37% of PSC patients would still have CA19–9 levels >129 U/mL without CCA.[102],[103] Moreover, a transient and significant rise in CA19–9 serum level may indicate bacterial cholangitis as a secondary complication in PSC patients.

Several imaging modalities are available for CCA. Combined MRI with MRCP or a multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) scan is considered standard of care for CCA diagnosis. In PSC patients, bile duct brushing obtained with ERCP is simple and highly specific (97%) for CCA. However, the low sensitivity (43%) may prevent its utilization as a diagnostic tool for early detection of CCA in PSC patients.[104]

Surgical intervention for CCA provides the only cure in early-stage disease; yet, few patients are eligible for resection procedure. However, it provides 5-year survival rates of <30% in cases with a negative resection margin. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with LT is considered in PSC-CCA when confined to the liver hilum or to hepatic parenchyma. Compared to conventional resection, this treatment approach has been associated with less recurrence risk and 5-year survival of up to 80%.[105],[106] As such, it should be considered as an alternative option to resection for node-negative hilar with localized CCA.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicating PSC were mentioned in some series but seems to occur quite infrequently.

Gallbladder involvement is a common finding in 40% of PSC cases, which requires close follow-up based on gallbladder carcinoma risks. However, the majority of gallbladder lesions are more likely to be benign, including stones. In general, the prevalence of gallbladder mass lesions hovers around 6%, in which more than 50% are malignant. Gallbladder annual surveillance via ultrasound evaluation is the key. Once diagnosed, cholecystectomy should be considered for eligible PSC patients with gallbladder mass lesions as a prophylactic approach for gallbladder adenocarcinoma.[105]




   Overlap Syndromes of Autoimmune Hepatitis Top


Background

“Overlap syndrome” is a term used to describe an overlap between AIH and either PBC or PSC, with features of both diseases occurring simultaneously or consecutively. The consecutive onset of both conditions supports the association between these particular autoimmune disorders. Overlap syndromes can be classified based on various pathophysiologic mechanisms and clinical presentations as either: (i) a pure coincidence of two independent autoimmune diseases; (ii) a different genetic background that determines the clinical, biochemical, and histologic appearance of one autoimmune disease entity; and (iii) a representation of the middle of a continuous spectrum of two autoimmune diseases.[78],[107] Due to the absence of well-validated diagnostic criteria and heterogeneous clinical presentations, the diagnosis of overlap syndrome will require prompt pattern recognition, by complete histological evaluation by an experienced pathologist, exclusion of other causes, and interpretation of radiological and serological findings.



Classification of Overlap Syndromes and Diagnosis

Overlap syndrome of autoimmune hepatitis is classified into three classical phenotypes of AIH, PBC, and PSC, based on clinical characteristics and serological markers for AIH and either PBC or PSC. Additionally, the overlap feature between AIH and other indeterminate autoimmune cholestatic syndrome variants such as AMA-negative PBC, small-duct PSC, and autoimmune cholangitis, have been defined as “AIH-cholestatic overlap syndrome”.[108] In general, overlapping features are observed in liver histology, serologic findings, biochemical tests, clinical findings, and symptoms. An overlap syndrome between PSC and PBC is rare, as both possess high disease-specific features which were reported in a few patients only. In a cohort of 261 patients with autoimmune liver disease, the estimated PBC-PSC overlap frequency was 0.7% over a period of 20 years of prospective follow-up.[109] A differential diagnosis of overlap syndrome should be considered in patients with autoimmune liver disease, which deviates away from its classical serological, and biochemical findings, from a normal clinical course, including the expected therapy responses.[110]


   Autoimmune Hepatitis-Primary Biliary Cholangitis Overlap Syndrome Top


Definition and Diagnostic Criteria

Autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis is a diagnostic term used for patients with clinical features of AMA-positive PBC and AIH.[111] Due to the wide spectrum of clinical characteristics and presentations, specific criteria were designated for diagnosing AIH and PBC overlap syndrome. These include the simplified International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) scoring system, the revised IAIHG scoring system, the IAIHG scoring system, and the Paris criteria with a wide variability of specificity and sensitivity reported for each.[112],[113],[114],[115] The Paris criteria in particular were promulgated in 1998 with higher specificity (97%) and sensitivity (92%), for overlap syndrome diagnosis.[112] Furthermore, these are the most commonly utilized criteria which are recognized by AASLD and EASL to establish the overlap syndrome diagnosis in the presence of AIH's histologic findings (moderate to severe lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis) [Table 3] and [Table 4].[111],[112],[113],[114],[115],[116],[117]
Table 3: Paris criteria for PBC/AIH overlap syndrome

Click here to view
Table 4: Revised international autoimmune hepatitis group scoring system

Click here to view


The effectiveness of the original and revised IAIHG scoring systems which were used frequently for assessment of possible overlap syndrome in PBC patients was questioned recently. This is mainly due to the complex parameters needed in the systems, in addition to the fact that it was created for distinguishing AIH from PBC and not for diagnosing AIH in PBC patients. As a result, the position paper by IAIHG suggests that using these scoring systems to establish patients' subgroups is not recommended.[113],[114]

For overlap syndrome with AIH diagnosis in PBC patients, the application of simplified criteria for AIH diagnosis is recommended. Compared to the revised and original IAIHG scoring system, it is an easier diagnostic tool in overlap syndromes, with minimal limitations [Table 5].[115]
Table 5: Simplified international autoimmune hepatitis group scoring system

Click here to view


Epidemiology

In comparison to PSC and AIH overlap, PBC and AIH overlap is the most frequently occurring autoimmune liver disease.[116] In the absence of diagnostic criteria consensus, there is a wide range prevalence of AIH-PBC overlap. In PBC patients, AIH-PBC overlap prevalence is estimated to range between 4.3% and 9.2% compared to 2%–19% in AIH when revised IAIHG criteria are used.[117],[118] A significant observation is the high prevalence of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome among Hispanic patients with PBC disease, using simplified IAIHG criteria or Paris criteria, followed by non-Hispanic patients (31% and 13%, respectively). More frequent complications such as encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, esophageal varices, and ascites were reported, however, statistical significance was not reported.[119]

Clinical Presentation

Patients may have a sequential development of overlap syndrome starting with PBC followed by the development of AIH.[120] Yet, patients may have a simultaneous presentation of both diseases. In general, overlap syndrome should always be suspected in patients with either PBC or AIH, in which the clinical course deviates from the classical presentation of each disease alone in the absence of a known trigger such as drug-induced liver injury or viral infections. Acute deterioration of liver function or suboptimal response to treatment of a previously well-controlled autoimmune liver disease, should also raise the suspicion of an overlap syndrome. Clinically, patients with overlap syndrome have a predilection to other autoimmune diseases, oftentimes more than one. A retrospective study of 71 patients with overlap syndrome reported 43.6% of patients to have other associated autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disease (18.3%), Sjogren syndrome (8.4%), celiac disease (4.2%), psoriasis (4.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (4.2%), vitiligo (2.8%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (2.8%).[121]

Disease Natural History

The AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients' natural history can be inconsistent. Overlap syndrome patients are associated with higher rates of portal hypertension, gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, esophageal varices, as well as death or the need for LT in comparison to those diagnosed with PBC or AIH alone.[122]



Management and Treatment

Based on the current literature, no standardized protocol exists for the management of overlap syndrome. One reason is the lack of large RCTs due to the disease's low prevalence rate. A recent meta-analysis included eight RCTs with a total of 214 AIH-PBC overlap patients for analysis. They compared the use of UDCA alone to the use of a combination of corticosteroids and UDCA for the management of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome. Endpoints were clinical symptoms of pruritus and jaundice, changes in ALP and ALT, histologic regression, death, or need for LT, and adverse events. They concluded that although combination therapy of UDCA with corticosteroids had significantly improved ALP, ALT, and histologic regression, but without significant difference in adverse events compared to UDCA alone. In addition, the combination therapy also failed to improve symptoms of pruritus and jaundice or reduction of death or need for LT.[49] Nonetheless, the EASL guidelines recommend the addition of corticosteroid therapy to UDCA for those with severe interface hepatitis in its most recent guidelines.[49] The AASLD guidelines recommend UDCA with or without other immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of overlap syndrome, while highlighting the lack of evidence for optimal therapy and timing of the treatment.[111] Patients with no response to combination therapy of UDCA with corticosteroids may require alternative immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil.[123]




   Autoimmune Hepatitis–Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Overlap Syndrome Top


Epidemiology and Diagnostic Features

AIH-PSC overlap is one of the various rare syndromes seen in young adults, adolescents, and children.[124] Compared to AIH/PBC overlap syndrome, more uniform diagnostic criteria were endorsed for the diagnosis of AIH/PSC overlap syndrome. It is characterized by histologic or overt cholangiographic findings of PSC, in combination with robust histologic features of AIH, historically or concurrently.[125] In particular, PSC characteristic cholangiographic changes include annular, short, multifocal strictures, with dilated or normal ducts intervening segments, that involve the extrahepatic or intrahepatic biliary tree or both, which results in typical “beads-on-a-string” or “beaded like” appearances.

The AIH-PSC overlap syndrome has a sequential development in adults as it initially presents with AIH features followed by PSC diagnosis after many years.[126],[127] However, patients with an initial presentation of PSC alone, are rarely diagnosed with AIH later on as a sequential disease. When the revised IAIHG criteria were applied to large series of PSC patients, the prevalence of AIH-PSC overlapping features ranged from 7% - 14%.[128]

Clinical Presentation

In contrast to AIH, there is a strong association between PSC and IBD. Compared to patients with AIH only, a high prevalence of IBD is reported in AIH-PSC overlap patients, similar to PSC patients.[129],[130] Almost 16% of AIH adults may experience IBD which could be suggestive of concurrent PSC. For these cases, cholangiographic assessment is crucial. In addition, the diagnosis of AIH-PSC overlap should be considered in younger AIH patients with poor response to classical immunosuppressive therapy, and in those with histologic bile duct changes, cholestatic liver tests (increased bilirubin or ALP levels), and pruritus.[129]



Disease Course

Due to the progressive nature of the disease and lack of effective therapy for PSC, end-stage liver disease could develop up to 17 years following initial diagnosis with a 10-year survival of 65%.[84] However, the introduction of combination therapy (UDCA with immunosuppressive) in AIH-PSC overlap has improved survival rates compared to classical PSC. Yet, it has a worse outcome compared to classical AIH and AIH-PBC overlap disease.[127]



Management and Outcomes

Unlike classical PSC, both EASL and AASLD guidelines have recommended a combination of immunosuppressive and UDCA therapy for AIH-PSC overlap syndrome patients. However, EASL emphasizes that it was based on anecdotal reports and not evidence-based.[78],[84] Unlike in PBC and AIH, biochemical improvement in PSC or AIH-PSC overlap may not necessarily translate into better long-term clinical outcomes, nor does it predict survival free of liver-related complications or death.[131]

Potential risks and complications of PSC should be considered in the management plan for AIH-PSC overlap syndrome including pruritus, clinically significant dominant strictures, in addition to surveillance for colorectal cancer, gallbladder cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma in IBD patients (please refer to PSC section for details), although the data on actual risk is still lacking.[132] For end-stage diseases, a referral for liver transplantation assessment is recommended.


   Autoimmune Hepatitis–Cholestatic Overlap Syndrome Top


Epidemiology and Diagnostic Features

The combined presentation of indeterminate cholestasis, as well as AIH overlap, is known as AIH-cholestatic overlap syndrome, which was labeled previously as autoimmune cholangitis. It is a heterogeneous disease category involving small-duct PSC with AMA-negative PBC patients. In general, the disease is more prevalent in the age group of 40 to 50 years.[133] AIH patients are commonly observed with features of indeterminate cholestasis, with an estimated 5% - 11% overall frequency similar to the frequency of PSC overlap and PBC overlap disease, in AIH patients.[134] The diagnosis of this syndrome is suggested in patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIH, who have cholestatic features (either histologic, biochemical, or clinical) and absence of AMA, with normal bile duct histology and cholangiography.

Patients with AIH-cholestatic overlap are distinguished from AIH by lower levels of AST, gamma-globulin, and IgG in addition to higher levels of ALP and lower frequency of autoantibodies. They are also distinguished from PBC by higher levels of AST and bilirubin, lower serum IgM, and greater occurrence of autoantibodies. Their female predominance, lower levels of ALP, higher frequency of autoantibodies, and absence of IBD are more characteristic compared to PSC.[133]



Management and Outcomes

The overall response rate to treatment is significantly poorer than that of classical AIH, slightly lower than that of AIH large-duct PSC overlap, but similar to AIH small-duct PSC overlap.[107] The use of immunosuppressive agents or UDCA has been reported to be generally ineffective. Yet, no other treatment recommendations for AIH-cholestatic overlap have been suggested from the EASL or AASLD guidelines. Empiric therapy with corticosteroids alone, UDCA alone, or corticosteroids in combination with UDCA depending on the patient risk, predominant manifestation, and intensity of the cholestasis can be offered with unclear effect.[107]




   IGG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis Top


Immunoglobulin 4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) is a condition in which biliary manifestations are associated with IgG4-disease.[135],[136] It is characterized by elevated IgG4 in the serum, chronic IgG4 plasma cells, and lymphocytic inflammation of the intrahepatic and the extrahepatic biliary system ultimately causing sclerosis and stricture.[135],[137],[138],[139] IgG4-SC is frequently associated with other forms of IgG4-associated diseases, in particular autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).[137],[140] IgG4-SC was initially considered a biliary manifestation of AIP; however, it was later assigned as a stand-alone entity.[138],[141],[142],[143]

Epidemiology

The incidence and prevalence of AIP among the general population of Japan were reported at 1.4/100,000 and 4.6/100,000, respectively. A total of 39% of the included cohort had IgG4-SC, reflecting an estimated incidence and prevalence of 0.5/10,000 and 1.8/100,000, respectively.[144] Considering 10% of IgG4-SC patients are less likely to have associated AIP, the IgG4-SC prevalence may be set at 2/100,000.[145]

Pathogenesis of IgG4-SC

Similar to other IgG4-related diseases, IgG4-SC is associated with the presence of a high number of IgG4 plasma cells in the involved organ. However, this feature is not specific to IgG4-related diseases.[136] Characteristic histopathological features of IgG4-SC include obliterative phlebitis, storiform fibrosis, and dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration.[136],[146]

Clinical features of IgG4-SC

In general, males are more commonly affected, with a range of 79% - 83% of affected patients.[137],[135] In addition, it is likely to affect Japanese adults with a mean age of 66 years (range of 23–88.5 years).[137],[145],[147] Similar data were reported from the United Kingdom and the United States.[148],[149]

In total, 28% of IgG4-SC patients are asymptomatic.[137],[149] Obstructive jaundice is the most common clinical feature in IgG4-SC affecting 35%–77% of patients.[137],[148],[149],[150] Other features include pruritus (13%), abdominal pain (11%), and cholangitis (10%). Acute pancreatitis, poor appetite, and weight loss are less likely to be noted. IgG4-SC may present with concomitant IgG4-associated diseases such as AIP, which could vary among different populations (i.e., 87% in Japanese population; 95% among the USA and the UK populations)[136],[137],[148],[149] Body systems of IgG4-related diseases less likely to be associated with IgG4-SC include kidneys (1.15%–26.4%), salivary gland (5.6%–15%), retroperitoneum (7%–9.4%), lungs (0.7%–3.8%), lymph nodes (3.8%), and aorta (1.15%).[137],[148]

Diagnosis of IgG4-SC

Diagnosis of IgG4-SC requires confirmatory radiological, laboratory, and histological assessments. However, no single specific diagnostic test is available as of today for clinical use. A clinical diagnostic criterion for IgG4-SC was proposed by Ohara et al., which was then adopted by EASL in 2014 [Table 6].[138],[151] Furthermore, a second diagnostic criterion based on cholangiographic findings was established in 2012 by Nakazawa et al.[139] In 2019, a group from Japan proposed the third clinical practice guideline for IgG4-SC.[145] Both 2012 and 2019 criteria were based on the utilization of cholangiography analysis, serum IgG4 levels, association with AIP, or other organs IgG4 disease, and histopathological findings.[138],[139]
Table 6: Clinical diagnostic criteria of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis

Click here to view


In general, elevation in serum IgG4 has been reported in 84%–90% of IgG4-SC patients. Moreover, a cut-off value of 135 mg/dL for IgG4-SC diagnosis is widely accepted in the clinical practice although, Ohara et al. reported 10.5% of IgG4-SC patients have serum values below this level.[137],[138],[139],[145],[152] Yet, elevated serum IgG4 was reported to be of no specific value based on cohorts of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) in PSC patients.[153] Ohara et al. have shown 7.7% of the pancreatic cancer, CC, and PSC patients in control group had elevated serum IgG4 levels (>135mg/dl).[139] Elevated IgG4 at cut-off levels of 119 mg/dL for IgG4-SC compared to pancreatic cancer, 117 mg/dL for IgG4-SC compared to PSC, and 138 mg/dL for IgG4-SC compared to CC, Ohara et al.[152] showed an 87.6%–93.9% specificity and 89.8%–91.2% sensitivity for the diagnosis of IgG4-SC. On further subgroup analysis of the four radiological types of IgG4-SC, types 3 and 4 IgG4-SC had IgG4 levels of 138 mg/dL with lower sensitivity and specificity. Hence, a higher cut-off value of serum IgG4 was set at 207 mg/dL for better differentiation of IgG4-SC from CC.[152]

IgG4-SC Imaging Diagnosis

ERCP is considered the standard-of-care for IgG4-SC radiological evaluation and diagnosis. Nakazawa et al. in 2006 had established a cholangiographic classification for IgG4-SC, adopted by both by Ohara et al. in 2012 and the new Japanese guidelines in 2019.[138],[145],[153] Based on this classification, IgG4-SC is sub-divided into four types: a) type 1 involves diffuse stenosis of intra- and the extrahepatic bile ducts; b) type 2 is divided into 2a and 2b which includes intrahepatic bile ducts narrowing with restenotic dilatation (segmental) or without restenotic dilation (diffuse), respectively; c) type 3 involves stenosis which is present in both the hilar hepatic lesion as well as common bile duct lower part; and d) type 4 involves only hilar hepatic lesion.[138],[153] Based on the current literature, type 1 IgG4-SC is the most common (64%) followed by type 4 and type 3 (10% for both).[137] Other reports indicated intrahepatic biliary stricture as the most common finding (70%) in IgG4-SC patients.[148] In addition to ERCP, CT scan and MCRP can also be used for radiological IgG4-SC diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound is an additional radiological modality that can be applied in IgG4-SC diagnosis.[154]

One advantage for ERCP is cytology sampling which could be utilized to exclude CC. In addition, bile duct biopsy is recommended for IgG4-SC diagnosis, although more difficult to obtain[138],[145] It could demonstrate all previously mentioned features of obliterative phlebitis, storiform fibrosis, and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in order to reach a diagnosis.[136],[138],[145] IgG4-SC cholangiographic features could mimic those for CC, PSC, and pancreatic cancer.[139],[155] Furthermore, IgG4-SC histopathological features as well as other IgG4-related diseases can sometimes mimic sarcoidosis and multifocal fibrosclerosis.[136],[148]

Treatment of IgG4-SC

Corticosteroid therapy is recommended for all IgG4-SC patients, and prednisolone is one with an effective outcome.[137],[138],[145],[151] The recommended dose is 0.5–1 mg/kg/d or a starting dose of 30–40 mg daily as an initial dose for 2–4 weeks.[135] Afterwards, the dose can be reduced gradually, tapered down to a 5 mg maintenance dose on a weekly basis achieved in 2–3 months, with laboratory and radiological monitoring.[138],[145],[147],[151] Most patients (90%–100%) respond very well to prednisolone therapy with good disease control.[137],[147],[148],[149] Once on a maintenance dose, it is recommended to continue for 3 years.

The risk of relapse on maintenance therapy is estimated to range between 19% and 54%[137],[148] For these cases, it is recommended to reintroduce prednisolone. Additional treatment options for relapse include azathioprine, mycophenolate mof'etil, and methotrexate, with no clear evidence of benefit.[137],[145],[149] Endoscopic management and biliary drainage are recommended in patients with evidence of obstructive jaundice. In addition, 40.6%–50% of IgG4-SC patients benefited from endoscopic stent placement.[137],[145],[150] Surgical intervention is not usually recommended in IgG4-SC; however, patients suspected of CC and pancreatic cancer are eligible candidates.[137],[148]

Prognosis and Outcomes of IgG4-SC

Based on the literature, the follow-up duration varied significantly and ranged between 29.5 and 49.2 months.[137],[148],[149] During this period, the disease outcome was favorable with a restenosis rate of 1.6%–16.5% in 1–5 years. Decompensated cirrhosis is a rare feature for IgG4-SC in the Japanese population.[137] However, it was reported in 5.2% and 7.5% of the US and United Kingdom patients, respectively.[148],[149] At the same time, secondary CC is uncommon and liver- and biliary-related mortality are estimated to range between 0.8% and 2.6%.[137],[145],[148],[149] None of the reported patient cohorts from Japan and the United States required liver transplantation; however, one patient from the UK study required transplantation.[137],[148] The cumulative 5-year and 10-year survival rates from mortality related to liver disease and biliary disease were reported at 98.9% and 97.7%, respectively.[137]




   Cholestatic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Top


Cholestatic drug-induced liver injury (C-DILI) is a term used to describe a R ratio of <2 of serum ALT to serum ALP expressed as multiples of their upper limit of normal (ULN) at the onset of hepatic injury.[155],[156],[157] A recent modification to C-DILI calculation was adopted using a modified R ratio and the same parameters, but at the peak of the liver injury.[158] Based on the current literature, C-DILI represents 23%–32% of overall drug-induced liver injuries. It has various presentations ranging from pure cholestasis due to impaired biliary secretion, without biliary injury, to cholestasis associated with an acute or chronic biliary injury.[157],[158],[159],[160],[161]

Clinical Presentations and Patterns of C-DILI

Compared to patients with hepatocellular injury, patients with C-DILI are typically older, with a mean age of 54 to 60 years. Women are less commonly affected with a latency period (calculated from exposure to the development of DILI) compared to hepatocellular DILI (median of 15–31 d vs. 20–46 days). Patients with C-DILI are more likely to have jaundice compared to hepatocellular DILI (78% vs. 65%). Other common features include pruritus, skin rash, abdominal pain, and fever.[157],[159],[162] A common clinical feature of C-DILI is an acute cholestatic pattern that is subdivided into two subtypes. Bland cholestasis, complicating the use of anabolic steroids and oral contraceptives, is seen similarly in sepsis and heart failure. The second is cholestasis associated with liver cell injury causing a mixed pattern of liver injury. This form is seen with macrolide antibiotics and chlorpromazine.[157],[160],[161],[163]

Chronic cholestasis pattern has different forms. The first involves chronic cholestasis with vanishing duct syndrome and severe or complete loss of bile ducts on liver biopsy.[162],[163] In some cases, it could progress to cirrhosis with features similar to PBC, with negative AMA.[160] Several causative agents have been described including amoxicillin-clavulanate, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, central nervous system medications, and cardiovascular agents.[157],[159],[162],[164] In addition, several herbal agents such as angelica, archangelica, and artemisinin have been associated with 11% of this form of C-DILI.[162] The second form of C-DILI chronic cholestasis is known as secondary sclerosing cholangitis (S-SC) and could affect large bile ducts similar to PSC. This form has been described as a complication linked to intra-arterial infusion of chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis, as a result of ischemic injury to large bile ducts[163],[165] Other medications related to this form of C-DILI include amoxicillin-clavulanate, green tea, and sevoflurane.[165],[166]

Diagnosis of C-DILI

Similar to other forms of DILI, C-DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion. It relies primarily on establishing a relationship between drug exposure and features of hepatic injury. A detailed history of all prescribed and nonprescribed medications and herbal agents is essential to reach a diagnosis.[160],[167],[168] No particular laboratory tests for DILI are available; however, excluding other possible liver diseases is indicated according to the clinical features. Cholangiography using MRCP or ERCP could be requested if sclerosing cholangitis is suspected. On the other hand, liver biopsy is not commonly indicated; however, it may be needed to exclude other causes for hepatic injury.[167],[168]

Treatment and Outcome of C-DILI

Early discontinuation of the causative agent is the mainstay for treatment. In an acute injury, fast recovery is anticipated; however, patients with chronic injury may need a longer recovery of more than 6 months.[157],[169] UDCA is one treatment option, which has been used for symptomatic treatment with minimal supporting evidence.[167] Compared to hepatocellular DILI, C-DILI has a higher rate of chronicity (54% of patients) compared to 22% of those who had hepatocellular DILI.[166],[167],[168] On the other hand, C-DILI is less likely to have liver-related mortality, which varies based on reporting centers.[157] Furthermore, it is associated with a lower rate of liver transplantation.[157],[158]




   Cholestatic Liver Diseases in Pediatrics Top


Cholestatic jaundice in children is an uncommon condition and yet can be a serious disease leading to hepatobiliary dysfunction. Early detection by primary care physicians with timely referrals to pediatric hepatologists is crucial for optimal treatment and favorable prognosis. Cholestatic liver diseases in the pediatric population can be classified into genetical cholestatic liver diseases and fibro-polycystic liver diseases.


   Genetic Cholestatic Liver Diseases Top


Cholestasis is considered a highly selective impairment of one of many steps involved in the synthesis, secretion, and modification of bile acids, resulting in liver damage.[170] It is estimated that 45% of children with cholestatic liver diseases are genetically driven.[171] Genetic diseases of cholestasis include progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), progressive familial hypercholanemia, and bile acid synthesis defects (BASD).

Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis can be classified into PFIC1, PFIC2, and PFIC3, with an estimated incidence of 1/50,000 – 100,000.[172] All of these types represent the defects in ABCB4 gene encoding multidrug resistance (MDR3) protein, ABCB 11 gene encoding bile salt export pump (BSEP) protein, and ATP8B1 gene encoding the familial intrahepatic cholestasis 1 (FIC1) protein. Both PFIC2 and PFIC3 could represent 97% of all PFIC cases with variable ages at presentations.[173] Adult PFIC cases are likely to be associated with the MDR3 deficiency type. Furthermore, PFIC1 and PFIC2 are associated with the infantile presentation of failure to thrive, pruritus, and jaundice but normal or low GGT activities. Cholangiocyte epithelial injury and detergent bile salts inefficient inactivation are led by PFIC3, resulting in higher GGT cholestasis, which is a classical feature for PFIC3. For adults, common symptoms range from neonatal cholestasis to biliary cirrhosis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Both PFIC2 and PFIC3 could carry high risks for HCC in comparison to other cholestasis types.

Tight Junction Protein Type 2 (Familial Hypercholanemia)

Tight junction protein type 2 (TJP2) is characterized by higher serum bile acid and normal GGT with progressive cholestasis, that can lead to end-stage liver disease. TJP2 primary function is to prevent back diffusion of bile salts from canaliculi to blood circulation, leading to an increase in serum bile acid with normal GGT. For some cases, fat malabsorption and pruritus can complicate cholestasis with high liver enzymes and bilirubin, resulting in end-stage liver disease and eventually liver transplantation.[174]

Bile Acid Synthesis Defect

Inborn errors of bile acid synthesis are a life-threatening cholestatic liver disease in infants which can result in progressive neurological disease during childhood or adult life. Failure to synthesize bile acids may lead to defective micelle formation, fat malabsorption, and cholestasis. This is a common complication resulting from bile acid substrate toxic effect on hepatocyte BASD, characterized by conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with raised transaminases and normal GGT. The histopathological analysis is more likely to show giant cell hepatitis. Both types of BASD could often be treated effectively with bile acid replacement therapy. Hence, early diagnosis is crucial for a better prognosis.[175] The approach to cholestatic genetic liver diseases in children is shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Approach to cholestasis in pediatric patients[173]

Click here to view



   FibrO-Polycystic Liver Diseases Top


Fibro-polycystic liver diseases, known as ductal plate malformations, are a group of associated congenital disorders resulting from abnormal development of the biliary ductal system. They include congenital hepatic fibrosis, Caroli's disease, choledochal cysts, polycystic liver disease, and biliary hamartomas.

Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis

Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) is an autosomal recessive disease derived from biliary dysgenesis secondary to ductal palate malformation.[176] It coexists often with Caroli's disease, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD), Meckel-Gruber, Ivemark, Jeune, Joubert, and Arima syndromes.[177] Four clinical forms of CHF have been identified as the following: 1) portal hypertension, which the most common form, and severe in the presence of portal vein abnormality; 2) cholangitic cholestasis and recurrent cholangitis; 3) mixed; and 4) latent presentation for adult.[178]

Laboratory evaluation in portal hypertensive clinical form is usually unremarkable. For most patients, hepatosplenomegaly, esophageal varices, and gastrointestinal bleeding may occur in the 5th or 6th decade of life. In younger children, CHF is often accompanied by renal cysts. Ultrasound examination is the most informative diagnostic modality of CHF and often shows increased echogenicity of the liver, cysts in the hepatic parenchyma, splenomegaly, and fibrocystic changes in kidneys.[179] In addition, MRCP typically shows cystic dilatations and irregularities of the intrahepatic bile ducts and abnormally large left lobe of the liver. CHF appears pathologically by a variable degree of periportal fibrosis and irregularly shaped proliferating bile ducts, which is diagnostic, and can occur in hereditary PKD.

As of today, no therapies can repair primary ductal plate malformations, reverse the fibrosis, or resolve aberrant biliary trees. Hence, LT is commonly suggested as the only treatment option. Children with coexisting end-stage renal failure, as a result of polycystic kidney disease, may require liver and kidney transplantation.[180]

Caroli's Disease

Caroli's disease is a rare congenital disorder of the liver characterized by saccular dilatation of the large intrahepatic biliary ducts. It is transmitted as autosomal recessive in the same family.[181] Caroli's disease is the least common form, characterized by bile ductular ectasia without other apparent hepatic abnormalities. However, Caroli's syndrome is the more common variant, in which bile duct dilatation is associated with CHF.[181] Common clinical features include intermittent abdominal pain and hepatomegaly. In addition, recurrent bouts of cholangitis, abscess due to bile stasis, septicemia, and stone formation are common complications.

Acute obstructive episodes are potential complications characterized by fever, pruritus, jaundice, tender hepatomegaly with modest elevations of serum bilirubin, aminotransferases, and alkaline phosphatase.[182] For these cases, ultrasound evaluation is often suggested; however, MRCP may serve as the examination of choice.[182] Recommended treatment options for Caroli's disease include supportive care with antibacterial agents for cholangitis and UDCA for lithiasis. In patients with diffuse involvement, liver transplantation is the only effective modality. Long-term follow-up with ultrasound examination and tumor marker assessment is recommended, considering the high risk of cholangiocarcinoma in this particular group of patients.[183]

Choledochal Cysts

Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the bile ducts defined as abnormal, disproportionate, cystic dilatation of the biliary duct.[184] Overall, 60% of choledochal cysts are likely to present during the first year of life; however, other cases may present in adulthood with a higher incidence in females.[184] Choledochal cysts are often associated with cystolithiasis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, portal hypertension, and malignancy.[185] Choledochal cysts can be diagnosed using imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, MRCP, and ERCP, with reasonable specificity.[185]

Surgical management of choledochal cysts is the treatment of choice, and is based on cyst type and associated hepatobiliary pathology.[186] In general, excision of all bile duct cysts and bile flow re-establishment by mucosa-to-mucosa biliary–enteric anastomosis is recommended. The application of external drainage alone has no definitive role in the surgical management of choledochal cysts. Long-term follow-up must be maintained in adults due to the age-related risk of malignancy and the frequency of late anastomotic strictures in patients treated without cyst resection.[186]


   Management of Extrahepatic Manifestations of Cholestasis Top


Pruritus

This is a common manifestation of any cholestatic liver disease with a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. As of today, pruritus' underlying pathophysiology with fluctuation of the symptoms throughout the day is not well understood.[187] A common complication for pruritus includes discoloration of body secretions, hepatic dysfunction, and hepatitis.[188] Cholestyramine is considered the gold standard for pruritus management, which has to be spaced out from UDCA and other drugs by four hours.[189] It is usually mixed with water or sometimes fruit juice in order to improve medication tolerance.[190] Rifampin is suggested as the 2nd line of treatment, which is a pregnane X receptor agonist with great efficacy in the management of pruritus after 2 years of treatment.[191],[192],[193] Opiates antagonists can be utilized as a 3rd line of treatment with potential adverse events including withdrawal reactions, confusion, and pain.[192],[193],[194] Fibrates use in moderate to severe pruritus showed superior results to placebo, which was demonstrated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, Fibrates for cholestatic itch (FITCH) where bezafibrate (400 mg daily) was used for 21 days.[195] Other therapeutic agents include sertraline with minimal efficacy and unclear mechanism of action.[196] Invasive procedures such as bile duct drainage, plasmapheresis, and extracorporeal albumin dialysis have been reported with some efficacy in several case reports[197],[198],[199],[200] Recipients of LT are likely to experience relief from pruritus related to cholestasis.[201]



Fatigue

It is a common presentation, specifically in PBC and other cholestatic liver diseases, with unclear pathogenesis. Part of the management approach is to rule out potential underlying contributing factors such as depression, autonomic dysfunction with postural hypotension, and hypothyroidism.[202],[203] Supportive measures should be considered to facilitate the adaptation of fatigue symptoms.[204] Modafinil use for the treatment of fatigue in PBC in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study failed to show benefit despite being well tolerated by patients.[205]

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common complication of cholestatic liver disease patients, associated with known risk factors for osteoporosis, such as low body mass index, inactivity, age, female gender, smoking, and family history. For such cases, vitamin D and calcium supplementations are recommended, with no supporting evidence.[206] Hormone replacement therapy is a therapeutic agent with potential benefit in menopausal patients.[207],[208] In addition, the use of testosterone is not recommended in male patients due to the risk of HCC.

The application of bisphosphonates, specifically alendronate, in patients with osteoporosis has been reported.[209],[210] Evaluation of osteoporosis patients includes bone mineral density assessment dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the time of diagnosis, with follow-up in the first year and every 5 years, based on the condition severity.[211] Patients with a risk of fat-soluble vitamin deficiency (A, E, K) and clear symptoms (e.g. steatorrhea) would benefit from enteral supplementation. In addition, vitamin K is suggested for patients with cholestatic liver disease as well as those scheduled for invasive procedures.

Hyperlipidemia

Hyperlipidemia is a common complication of cholestatic liver disease, with a possible increase in cardiovascular risk factors in PBC patients, with a pooled risk ratio of 1.57 (95% CI,1.21–2.06).[212] UDCA will have a role in the treatment of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Statins and fibrates can be used in the presence of a family history of hyperlipidemia and additional cardiovascular risk factors.[213],[214],[217]



Contribution

All Authors have contributed equally to this manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

The Taskforce Group was supported by the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT), and the funding body did not influence the content of the guidelines.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Beuers U, Gershwin ME, Gish RG, Invernizzi P, Jones DE, Lindor K, et al. Changing nomenclature for PBC: From 'cirrhosis' to 'cholangitis'. Dig Liver Dis 2015;47:924-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Selmi C, Bowlus CL, Gershwin ME, Coppel RL. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet 2011;377:1600-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Selmi C, Mayo MJ, Bach N, Ishibashi H, Invernizzi P, Gish RG, et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: Genetics, epigenetics, and environment. Gastroenterology 2004;127:485-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shin S, Moh IH, Woo YS, Jung SW, Kim JB, Park JW, et al. Evidence from a familial case suggests maternal inheritance of primary biliary cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23:7191-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cheung AC, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ, Lazaridis KN. Epigenetics in the primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Semin Liver Dis 2017;37:159-74.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gershwin ME, Mackay IR, Sturgess A, Coppel RL. Identification and specificity of a cDNA encoding the 70 kd mitochondrial antigen recognized in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Immunol 1987;138:3525-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Moteki S, Leung PS, Dickson ER, Van Thiel DH, Galperin C, Buch T, et al. Epitope mapping and reactivity of autoantibodies to the E2 component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in primary biliary cirrhosis using recombinant 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex. Hepatology 1996;23:436-44.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kita H, Matsumura S, He XS, Ansari AA, Lian ZX, Van de Water J, et al. Quantitative and functional analysis of PDC-E2-specific autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Clin Invest 2002;109:1231-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Shimoda S, Van de Water J, Ansari A, Nakamura M, Ishibashi H, Coppel RL, et al. Identification and precursor frequency analysis of a common T cell epitope motif in mitochondrial autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Clin Invest 1998;102:1831-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Prince MI, Ducker SJ, James OF. Case-control studies of risk factors for primary biliary cirrhosis in two United Kingdom populations. Gut 2010;59:508-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gershwin ME, Selmi C, Worman HJ, Gold EB, Watnik M, Utts J, et al. Risk factors and comorbidities in primary biliary cirrhosis: A controlled interview-based study of 1032 patients. Hepatology 2005;42:1194-202.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hirschfield GM, Chapman RW, Karlsen TH, Lammert F, Lazaridis KN, Mason AL. The genetics of complex cholestatic disorders. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1357-74.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Boonstra K, Beuers U, Ponsioen CY. Epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: A systematic review. J Hepatol 2012;56:1181-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lu M, Li J, Haller IV, Romanelli RJ, VanWormer JJ, Rodriguez CV, et al. Factors associated with prevalence and treatment of primary biliary cholangitis in United States health systems. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:1333-41.e6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mattalia A, Quaranta S, Leung PS, Bauducci M, Van de Water J, Calvo PL, et al. Characterization of antimitochondrial antibodies in health adults. Hepatology 1998;27:656-61.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Shibata M, Onozuka Y, Morizane T, Koizumi H, Kawaguchi N, Miyakawa H, et al. Prevalence of antimitochondrial antibody in Japanese corporate workers in Kanagawa prefecture. J Gastroenterol 2004;39:255-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Liu JZ, Almarri MA, Gaffney DJ, Mells GF, Jostins L, Cordell HJ, et al. Dense fine-mapping study identifies new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2012;44:1137-41.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dahlqvist G, Gaouar F, Carrat F, Meurisse S, Chazouillères O, Poupon R, et al. Large-scale characterization study of patients with antimitochondrial antibodies but nonestablished primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology 2017;65:152-63.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Metcalf JV, Mitchison HC, Palmer JM, Jones DE, Bassendine MF, James OF. Natural history of early primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet 1996;348:1399-402.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lazaridis KN, Juran BD, Boe GM, Slusser JP, de Andrade M, Homburger HA, et al. Increased prevalence of antimitochondrial antibodies in first-degree relatives of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;46:785-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Roll J, Boyer JL, Barry D, Klatskin G. The prognostic importance of clinical and histologic features in asymptomatic and symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Christensen E, Neuberger J, Crowe J, Altman DG, Popper H, Portmann B, et al. Beneficial effect of azathioprine and prediction of prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Final results of an international trial. Gastroenterology 1985;89:1084-91.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Corpechot C, Carrat F, Bonnand AM, Poupon RE, Poupon R. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on liver fibrosis progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2000;32:1196-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Locke GR 3rd, Therneau TM, Ludwig J, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Time course of histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 1996;23:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Prince M, Chetwynd A, Newman W, Metcalf JV, James OF. Survival and symptom progression in a geographically based cohort of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: Follow-up for up to 28 years. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1044-51.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gores GJ, Wiesner RH, Dickson ER, Zinsmeister AR, Jorgensen RA, Langworthy A. Prospective evaluation of esophageal varices in primary biliary cirrhosis: Development, natural history, and influence on survival. Gastroenterology 1989;96:1552-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
MacQuillan GC. Neuberger J. Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2003;7:941-56.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Milkiewicz P. Liver transplantation in primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2008;12:461-72; xi.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Montano-Loza AJ, Hansen BE, Corpechot C, Roccarina D, Thorburn D, Trivedi P, et al. Factors associated with recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation and effects on graft and patient survival. Gastroenterology 2019;156:96-107.e1.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Dickson ER, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR, Fisher LD, Langworthy A. Prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Model for decision making. Hepatology 1989;10:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Carbone M, Sharp SJ, Flack S, Paximadas D, Spiess K, Adgey C, et al. The UK-PBC risk scores: Derivation and validation of a scoring system for long-term prediction of end-stage liver disease in primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology 2016;63:930-50.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lammers WJ, Hirschfield GM, Corpechot C, Nevens F, Lindor KD, Janssen HL, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system to predict outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Gastroenterology 2015;149:1804-12.e4.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Long RG, Scheuer PJ, Sherlock S. Presentation and course of asymptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1977;72:1204-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Mahl TC, Shockcor W, Boyer JL, Primary biliary cirrhosis: Survival of a large cohort of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients followed for 24 years. J Hepatol 1994;20:707-13.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Mitchison HC, Lucey MR, Kelly PJ, Neuberger JM, Williams R, James OF. Symptom development and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: A study in two centers. Gastroenterology 1990;99:778-84.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Nyberg A, Loof L.Primary biliary cirrhosis: Clinical features and outcome, with special reference to asymptomatic disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:57-64.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Springer J, Cauch-Dudek K, O'Rourke K, Wanless IR, Heathcote EJ. Asymptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis: A study of its natural history and prognosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Lammers WJ, van Buuren HR, Hirschfield GM, Janssen HL, Invernizzi P, Mason AL, et al. Levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin are surrogate end points of outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: An international follow-up study. Gastroenterology 2014;147:1338-49.e5; quiz e15.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME. Primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1261-73.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Beuers U. Drug insight: Mechanisms and sites of action of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestasis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;3:318-28.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Parés A, Caballería L, Rodés J, Bruguera M, Rodrigo L, García-Plaza A, et al. Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: Results of a double-blind controlled multicentric trial. UDCA-Cooperative Group from the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 2000;32:561-6.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Corpechot C, Carrat F, Bahr A, Chrétien Y, Poupon RE, Poupon R. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on the natural course of primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2005;128:297-303.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Pares A, Caballeria L, Rodes J,. Excellent long-term survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology 2006;130:715-20.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Montano-Loza AJ, Corpechot C. Definition and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis and an incomplete response to therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh. 2020.06.062.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Rousseau A, Le Gruyer A, Habersetzer F, Mathurin P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of bezafibrate in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2171-81.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Nevens F, Andreone P, Mazzella G, Strasser SI, Bowlus C, Invernizzi P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of obeticholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med 2016;375:631-43.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Zhang H, Yang J, Zhu R, Zheng Y, Zhou Y, Dai W, et al. Combination therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid and budesonide for PBC-AIH overlap syndrome: A meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015;9:567-74.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
European Association for the Study of the. EASL clinical practice guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol 2017;67:145-72.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Leuschner M, Maier KP, Schlichting J, Strahl S, Herrmann G, Dahm HH, et al. Oral budesonide and ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: Results of a prospective double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 1999;117:918-25.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Rautiainen H, Kärkkäinen P, Karvonen AL, Nurmi H, Pikkarainen P, Nuutinen H, et al. Budesonide combined with UDCA to improve liver histology in primary biliary cirrhosis: A three-year randomized trial. Hepatology 2005;41:747-52.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Angulo P, Jorgensen RA, Keach JC, Dickson ER, Smith C, Lindor KD. Oral budesonide in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Hepatology 2000;31:318-23.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Hempfling W, Grunhage F, Dilger K, Reichel C, Beuers U, Sauerbruch T. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in early- and late-stage primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2003;38:196-202.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Hirschfield GM, Beuers U, Kupcinskas L, Ott P, Bergquist A, Färkkilä M, et al. A placebo-controlled randomised trial of budesonide for PBC following an insufficient response to UDCA. J Hepatol 2021;74:321-9.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Belnou P, Montano-Loza AJ, Mason A, Ebadi M, et al. Long-term impact of preventive UDCA therapy after transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol 2020;73:559-65.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Pellicciari R, Fiorucci S, Camaioni E, Clerici C, Costantino G, Maloney PR, et al. 6alpha-ethyl-chenodeoxycholic acid (6-ECDCA), a potent and selective FXR agonist endowed with anticholestatic activity. J Med Chem 2002;45:3569-72.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Thomas C, Pellicciari R, Pruzanski M, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:678-93.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Lefebvre P, Cariou B, Lien F, Kuipers F, Staels B. Role of bile acids and bile acid receptors in metabolic regulation. Physiol Rev 2009;89:147-91.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:956-65.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Beuers U, Trauner M, Jansen P, Poupon R. New paradigms in the treatment of hepatic cholestasis: From UDCA to FXR, PXR and beyond. J Hepatol 2015;62 (1 Suppl):S25-37.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Kowdley KV, Luketic V, Chapman R, Hirschfield GM, Poupon R, Schramm C, et al. A randomized trial of obeticholic acid monotherapy in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology 2018;67:1890-902.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Levy C, Peter JA, Nelson DR, Keach J, Petz J, Cabrera R, et al. Pilot study: Fenofibrate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;33:235-42.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Pollheimer MJ, Halilbasic E, Fickert P, Trauner M. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2011;25:727-39.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Chapman R, Cullen S. Etiopathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:3350-9.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Liu JZ, Hov JR, Folseraas T, Ellinghaus E, Rushbrook SM, Doncheva NT, et al. Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies nine new risk loci for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Nat Genet 2013;45:670-5.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Molodecky NA, Kareemi H, Parab R, Barkema HW, Quan H, Myers RP, et al. Incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 2011;53:1590-9.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Tischendorf JJ, Hecker H, Krüger M, Manns MP, Meier PN. Characterization, outcome, and prognosis in 273 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: A single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:107-14.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Bolier R, Oude Elferink RP, Beuers U. Advances in pathogenesis and treatment of pruritus. Clin Liver Dis 2013;17:319-29.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Kaplan GG, Laupland KB, Butzner D, Urbanski SJ, Lee SS. The burden of large and small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis in adults and children: A population-based analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1042-9.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Sandhu BS, Luketic VA. Management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2006;2:843-9.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Abraham SC, Kamath PS, Eghtesad B, Demetris AJ, Krasinskas AM. Liver transplantation in precirrhotic biliary tract disease: Portal hypertension is frequently associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia and obliterative portal venopathy. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1454-61.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Maurice JB, Thorburn D. Precision medicine in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Dig Dis 2019;20:346-56.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Angulo P, Grandison GA, Fong DG, Keach JC, Lindor KD, Bjornsson E, et al. Bone disease in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 2011;140:180-8.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Harrison ME, American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:646-59; quiz 660.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Feldstein AE, Perrault J, El-Youssif M, Lindor KD, Freese DK, Angulo P. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: A long-term follow-up study. Hepatology 2003;38:210-7.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Mendes FD, Jorgensen R, Keach J, Katzmann JA, Smyrk T, Donlinger J, et al. Elevated serum IgG4 concentration in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2070-5.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Abdalian R, Heathcote EJ. Sclerosing cholangitis: A focus on secondary causes. Hepatology 2006;44:1063-74.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
European Association for the Study of the Liver., EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2009;51:237-67.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Andraus W, Haddad L, Nacif LS, Silva FD, Blasbalg R, D'Albuquerque LA. The best approach for diagnosing primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66:1987-9.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Dave M, Elmunzer BJ, Dwamena BA, Higgins PD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2010;256:387-96.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Meagher S, Yusoff I, Kennedy W, Martel M, Adam V, Barkun A. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy 2007;39:222-8.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Burak KW, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Is there a role for liver biopsy in primary sclerosing cholangitis? Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1155-8.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Sirpal S, Chandok N. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Diagnostic and management challenges. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2017;10:265-73.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Chapman R, Fevery J, Kalloo A, Nagorney DM, Boberg KM, Shneider B, et al. Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2010;51:660-78.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Smith T, Befeler AS. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2007;9:54-9.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Harrison ME, McCashland T, Befeler AS, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2009;50:808-14.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Imam MH, Sinakos E, Gossard AA, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Edwyn Harrison M, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with early stage primary sclerosing cholangitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:1185-92.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.
Eaton JE, Silveira MG, Pardi DS, Sinakos E, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid is associated with the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1638-45.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.
Vlăduţ C, Ciocîrlan M, Bilous D, Şandru V, Stan-Ilie M, Panic N, et al. An overview on primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Clin Med 2020;9:754.  Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.
Björnsson E, Lindqvist-Ottosson J, Asztely M, Olsson R. Dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:502-8.  Back to cited text no. 90
    
91.
Gotthardt DN, Rudolph G, Klöters-Plachky P, Kulaksiz H, Stiehl A. Endoscopic dilation of dominant stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Outcome after long-term treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:527-34.  Back to cited text no. 91
    
92.
Kaya M, Petersen BT, Angulo P, Baron TH, Andrews JC, Gostout CJ, et al. Balloon dilation compared to stenting of dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1059-66.  Back to cited text no. 92
    
93.
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Blero D, Devière J, Laugiers R, Heresbach D, et al. Biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012;44:277-98.  Back to cited text no. 93
    
94.
Welsh FK, Wigmore SJ. Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy is the method of choice for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Transplantation 2004;77:602-4.  Back to cited text no. 94
    
95.
Graziadei IW, Wiesner RH, Marotta PJ, Porayko MK, Hay JE, Charlton MR, et al. Long-term results of patients undergoing liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 1999;30:1121-7.  Back to cited text no. 95
    
96.
Rossi RE, Conte D, Massironi S. Primary sclerosing cholangitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease: An update. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;28:123-31.  Back to cited text no. 96
    
97.
Mertz A, Nguyen NA, Katsanos KH, Kwok RM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease comorbidity: An update of the evidence. Ann Gastroenterol 2019;32:124-33.  Back to cited text no. 97
    
98.
de Vries AB, Janse M, Blokzijl H, Weersma RK. Distinctive inflammatory bowel disease phenotype in primary sclerosing cholangitis. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:1956-71.  Back to cited text no. 98
    
99.
Kirstein MM, Vogel A. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med 2016;32:395-400.  Back to cited text no. 99
    
100.
Fung BM, Lindor KD, Tabibian JH. Cancer risk in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Epidemiology, prevention, and surveillance strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:659-671.  Back to cited text no. 100
    
101.
Gulamhusein AF, Eaton JE, Tabibian JH, Atkinson EJ, Juran BD, Lazaridis KN. Duration of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Associated With Increased Risk of Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and IBD. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:705-11.  Back to cited text no. 101
    
102.
Darwish Murad S, Kim WR, Therneau T, Gores GJ, Rosen CB, Martenson JA, et al. Predictors of pretransplant dropout and posttransplant recurrence in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2012;56:972-81.  Back to cited text no. 102
    
103.
Sinakos E, Saenger AK, Keach J, Kim WR, Lindor KD. Many patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and increased serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 do not have cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:434-9.e1.  Back to cited text no. 103
    
104.
Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Njei B, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Diagnostic yield of bile duct brushings for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:783-9.  Back to cited text no. 104
    
105.
Bonato G, Cristoferi L, Strazzabosco M, Fabris L. Malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis--A continuing threat. Dig Dis 2015;33(Suppl 2):140-8.  Back to cited text no. 105
    
106.
Rea DJ, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB, Haddock MG, Alberts SR, Kremers WK, et al. Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more effective than resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2005;242:451-8; discussion 458-61.  Back to cited text no. 106
    
107.
Czaja AJ. Diagnosis and management of the overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis. Can J Gastroenterol 2013;27:417-23.  Back to cited text no. 107
    
108.
Czaja AJ. The overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:326-43.  Back to cited text no. 108
    
109.
Kingham JG, Abbasi A. Co-existence of primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: A rare overlap syndrome put in perspective. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;17:1077-80.  Back to cited text no. 109
    
110.
Haldar D, Hirschfield GM. Overlap syndrome: A real syndrome? Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2014;3:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 110
    
111.
Lindor KD, Gershwin ME, Poupon R, Kaplan M, Bergasa NV, Heathcote EJ, et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2009;50:291-308.  Back to cited text no. 111
    
112.
Chazouillères O, Wendum D, Serfaty L, Montembault S, Rosmorduc O, Poupon R. Primary biliary cirrhosis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome: Clinical features and response to therapy. Hepatology 1998;28:296-301.  Back to cited text no. 112
    
113.
Johnson PJ, McFarlane IG. Meeting report: International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Hepatology 1993;18:998-1005.  Back to cited text no. 113
    
114.
Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, Bianchi L, Burroughs AK, Cancado EL, et al. International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: Review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 1999;31:929-38.  Back to cited text no. 114
    
115.
Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ, Parés A, Dalekos GN, Krawitt EL, et al. Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2008;48:169-76.  Back to cited text no. 115
    
116.
Kim WR, Lindor KD, Locke GR 3rd, Therneau TM, Homburger HA, Batts KP, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis in a US community. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1631-6.  Back to cited text no. 116
    
117.
Efe C, Ozaslan E, Heurgué-Berlot A, Kav T, Masi C, Purnak T, et al. Sequential presentation of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:532-7.  Back to cited text no. 117
    
118.
Wang Q, Selmi C, Zhou X, Qiu D, Li Z, Miao Q, et al. Epigenetic considerations and the clinical reevaluation of the overlap syndrome between primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis. J Autoimmun 2013;41:140-5.  Back to cited text no. 118
    
119.
Levy C, Naik J, Giordano C, Mandalia A, O'Brien C, Bhamidimarri KR, et al. Hispanics with primary biliary cirrhosis are more likely to have features of autoimmune hepatitis and reduced response to ursodeoxycholic acid than non-Hispanics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:1398-405.  Back to cited text no. 119
    
120.
Lohse AW, zum Büschenfelde KH, Franz B, Kanzler S, Gerken G, Dienes HP. Characterization of the overlap syndrome of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis: Evidence for it being a hepatitic form of PBC in genetically susceptible individuals. Hepatology 1999;29:1078-84.  Back to cited text no. 120
    
121.
Efe C, Wahlin S, Ozaslan E, Berlot AH, Purnak T, Muratori L, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis/primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome and associated extrahepatic autoimmune diseases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;24:531-4.  Back to cited text no. 121
    
122.
Silveira MG, Talwalkar JA, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: Long-term outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1244-50.  Back to cited text no. 122
    
123.
Baven-Pronk AM, Coenraad MJ, van Buuren HR, de Man RA, van Erpecum KJ, Lamers MM, et al. The role of mycophenolate mofetil in the management of autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34:335-43.  Back to cited text no. 123
    
124.
Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Karani J, Harrison P, Donaldson PT, Vergani D, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis/sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome in childhood: A 16-year prospective study. Hepatology 2001;33:544-53.  Back to cited text no. 124
    
125.
Trivedi PJ, Hirschfield GM. Review article: Overlap syndromes and autoimmune liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:517-33.  Back to cited text no. 125
    
126.
Abdo AA, Bain VG, Kichian K, Lee SS. Evolution of autoimmune hepatitis to primary sclerosing cholangitis: A sequential syndrome. Hepatology 2002;36:1393-9.  Back to cited text no. 126
    
127.
Floreani A, Rizzotto ER, Ferrara F, Carderi I, Caroli D, Blasone L, et al. Clinical course and outcome of autoimmune hepatitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1516-22.  Back to cited text no. 127
    
128.
Kaya M, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: An evaluation of a modified scoring system. J Hepatol 2000;33:537-42.  Back to cited text no. 128
    
129.
Boberg KM, Chapman RW, Hirschfield GM, Lohse AW, Manns MP, Schrumpf E, et al. Overlap syndromes: The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) position statement on a controversial issue. J Hepatol 2011;54:374-85.  Back to cited text no. 129
    
130.
Czaja AJ. Frequency and nature of the variant syndromes of autoimmune liver disease. Hepatology 1998;28:360-5.  Back to cited text no. 130
    
131.
van Buuren HR, van Hoogstraten HJE, Terkivatan T, Schalm SW, Vleggaar FP. High prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2000;33:543-8.  Back to cited text no. 131
    
132.
Lüth S, Kanzler S, Frenzel C, Kasper HU, Dienes HP, Schramm C, et al. Characteristics and long-term prognosis of the autoimmune hepatitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 132
    
133.
Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA, Santrach PJ, Moore SB. Autoimmune cholangitis within the spectrum of autoimmune liver disease. Hepatology 2000;31:1231-8.  Back to cited text no. 133
    
134.
Czaja AJ. Cholestatic phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:1430-8.  Back to cited text no. 134
    
135.
Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, Yi EE, Sato Y, Yoshino T, et al. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol 2012;25:1181-92.  Back to cited text no. 135
    
136.
Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med 2012;366:539-51.  Back to cited text no. 136
    
137.
Tanaka A, Tazuma S, Okazaki K, Nakazawa T, Inui K, Chiba T, et al. Clinical features, response to treatment, and outcomes of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15:920-926.e3.  Back to cited text no. 137
    
138.
Ohara H, Okazaki K, Tsubouchi H, Inui K, Kawa S, Kamisawa T, et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis 2012. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012;19:536-42.  Back to cited text no. 138
    
139.
Nakazawa T, Naitoh I, Hayashi K, Okumura F, Miyabe K, Yoshida M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis based on cholangiographic classification. J Gastroenterol 2012;47:79-87.  Back to cited text no. 139
    
140.
Hubers LM, Maillette de Buy Wenniger LJ, Doorenspleet ME, Klarenbeek PL, Verheij J, Rauws EA, et al. IgG4-associated cholangitis: A comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2015;48:198-206.  Back to cited text no. 140
    
141.
Webster GJ, Pereira SP, Chapman RW, Autoimmune pancreatitis/IgG4-associated cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis--overlapping or separate diseases? J Hepatol 2009;51:398-402.  Back to cited text no. 141
    
142.
Hirano K, Shiratori Y, Komatsu Y, Yamamoto N, Sasahira N, Toda N, et al. Involvement of the biliary system in autoimmune pancreatitis: A follow-up study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;1:453-64.  Back to cited text no. 142
    
143.
Björnsson E, Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Lindor K. Immunoglobulin G4 associated cholangitis: Description of an emerging clinical entity based on review of the literature. Hepatology 2007;45:1547-54.  Back to cited text no. 143
    
144.
Kanno A, Masamune A, Okazaki K, Kamisawa T, Kawa S, Nishimori I, et al. Nationwide epidemiological survey of autoimmune pancreatitis in Japan in 2011. Pancreas 2015;44:535-9.  Back to cited text no. 144
    
145.
Kamisawa T, Nakazawa T, Tazuma S, Zen Y, Tanaka A, Ohara H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019;26:9-42.  Back to cited text no. 145
    
146.
Deshpande V, Sainani NI, Chung RT, Pratt DS, Mentha G, Rubbia-Brandt L, et al. IgG4-associated cholangitis: A comparative histological and immunophenotypic study with primary sclerosing cholangitis on liver biopsy material. Mod Pathol 2009;22:1287-95.  Back to cited text no. 146
    
147.
Tanaka A, Tazuma S, Okazaki K, Tsubouchi H, Inui K, Takikawa H. Nationwide survey for primary sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014;21:43-50.  Back to cited text no. 147
    
148.
Ghazale A, Chari ST, Zhang L, Smyrk TC, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis: Clinical profile and response to therapy. Gastroenterology 2008;134:706-15.  Back to cited text no. 148
    
149.
Huggett MT, Culver EL, Kumar M, Hurst JM, Rodriguez-Justo M, Chapman MH, et al. Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is associated with extrapancreatic organ failure, malignancy, and mortality in a prospective UK cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1675-83.  Back to cited text no. 149
    
150.
Miyazawa M, Takatori H, Kawaguchi K, Kitamura K, Arai K, Matsuda K, et al. Management of biliary stricture in patients with IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232089.  Back to cited text no. 150
    
151.
Okazaki K, Uchida K, Koyabu M, Miyoshi H, Ikeura T, Takaoka M. IgG4 cholangiopathy: Current concept, diagnosis, and pathogenesis. J Hepatol 2014;61:690-5.  Back to cited text no. 151
    
152.
Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Kawa S, Kamisawa T, Shimosegawa T, Uchida K, et al. Establishment of a serum IgG4 cut-off value for the differential diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis: A Japanese cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:1247-51.  Back to cited text no. 152
    
153.
Nakazawa T, Ohara H, Sano H, Ando T, Joh T. Schematic classification of sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis by cholangiography. Pancreas 2006;32:229.  Back to cited text no. 153
    
154.
Du S, Liu G, Cheng X, Li Y, Wang Q, Li J, et al. Differential diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016;50:501-5.  Back to cited text no. 154
    
155.
Benichou C, Danan G, Flahault A. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs--II. An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods: Case reports with positive rechallenge. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1331-6.  Back to cited text no. 155
    
156.
Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ, Larrey D, Molokhia M, Takikawa H, et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:806-15.  Back to cited text no. 156
    
157.
Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R, Lee W, Stolz A, Talwalkar J, et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: The DILIN prospective study. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1340-52.e7.  Back to cited text no. 157
    
158.
Alhaddad O, Elsabaawy M, Abdelsameea E, Abdallah A, Shabaan A, Ehsan N, et al. Presentations, causes and outcomes of drug-induced liver injury in Egypt. Sci Rep 2020;10:5124.  Back to cited text no. 158
    
159.
Björnsson ES, Bergmann OM, Björnsson HK, Kvaran RB, Olafsson S. Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1419-25, 1425.e1-3; quiz e19-20.  Back to cited text no. 159
    
160.
Chitturi S, Farrell GC. Drug-induced cholestasis. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2001;12:113-24.  Back to cited text no. 160
    
161.
Velayudham LS, Farrell GC. Drug-induced cholestasis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2003;2:287-304.  Back to cited text no. 161
    
162.
Bonkovsky HL, Kleiner DE, Gu J, Odin JA, Russo MW, Navarro VM, et al. Clinical presentations and outcomes of bile duct loss caused by drugs and herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology 2017;65:1267-77.  Back to cited text no. 162
    
163.
Ramachandran R, Kakar S. Histological patterns in drug-induced liver disease. J Clin Pathol 2009;62:481-92.  Back to cited text no. 163
    
164.
Moradpour D, Altorfer J, Flury R, Greminger P, Meyenberger C, Jost R, et al. Chlorpromazine-induced vanishing bile duct syndrome leading to biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 1994;20:1437-41.  Back to cited text no. 164
    
165.
Alazmi WM, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Fogel EL, Schmidt S, Sherman S, et al. Chemotherapy-induced sclerosing cholangitis: Long-term response to endoscopic therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:353-7  Back to cited text no. 165
    
166.
Gudnason HO, Björnsson HK, Gardarsdottir M, Thorisson HM, Olafsson S, Bergmann OM, et al. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with drug-induced liver injury. Dig Liver Dis 2015;47:502-7.  Back to cited text no. 166
    
167.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: [email protected], Clinical Practice Guideline Panel: Chair, Panel members, EASL Governing Board representative. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol 2019;70:1222-61.  Back to cited text no. 167
    
168.
Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL, Navarro VJ, Lee WM, Fontana RJ, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: The diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:950-66.  Back to cited text no. 168
    
169.
Fontana RJ, Hayashi PH, Barnhart H, Kleiner DE, Reddy KR, Chalasani N, et al. Persistent liver biochemistry abnormalities are more common in older patients and those with cholestatic drug induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1450-9.  Back to cited text no. 169
    
170.
Houten SM, Watanabe M, Auwerx J. Endocrine functions of bile acids. EMBO J 2006;25:1419-25.  Back to cited text no. 170
    
171.
Chen HL. Mining the idiopathic genetic cholestasis syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:389-91.  Back to cited text no. 171
    
172.
Fagiuoli S, Daina E, D'Antiga L, Colledan M, Remuzzi G. Monogenic diseases that can be cured by liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2013;59:595-612.  Back to cited text no. 172
    
173.
Shagrani M, Burkholder J, Broering D, Abouelhoda M, Faquih T, El-Kalioby M, et al. Genetic profiling of children with advanced cholestatic liver disease. Clin Genet 2017;92:52-61.  Back to cited text no. 173
    
174.
Sambrotta M, Thompson RJ. Mutations in TJP2, encoding zona occludens 2, and liver disease. Tissue Barriers 2015;3:e1026537.  Back to cited text no. 174
    
175.
Clayton PT. Disorders of bile acid synthesis. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34:593-604.  Back to cited text no. 175
    
176.
Ward CJ, Hogan MC, Rossetti S, Walker D, Sneddon T, Wang X, et al. The gene mutated in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease encodes a large, receptor-like protein. Nat Genet 2002;30:259-69.  Back to cited text no. 176
    
177.
Desmet VJ. Congenital diseases of intrahepatic bile ducts: Variations on the theme “ductal plate malformation”. Hepatology 1992;16:1069-83.  Back to cited text no. 177
    
178.
Shorbagi A, Bayraktar Y. Experience of a single center with congenital hepatic fibrosis: A review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16: 683-90.  Back to cited text no. 178
    
179.
Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vilgrain V, Vullierme MP, Marin D, Lagalla R. Fibropolycystic liver disease: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2005;25:659-70.  Back to cited text no. 179
    
180.
Rawat D, Kelly DA, Milford DV, Sharif K, Lloyd C, McKiernan PJ. Phenotypic variation and long-term outcome in children with congenital hepatic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013;57:161-6.  Back to cited text no. 180
    
181.
Jordon D, Harpaz N, Thung SN. Caroli's disease and adult polycystic kidney disease: A rarely recognized association. Liver 1989;9:30-5.  Back to cited text no. 181
    
182.
Tsuchida Y, Sato T, Sanjo K, Etoh T, Hata K, Terawaki K, et al. Evaluation of long-term results of Caroli's disease: 21 years' observation of a family with autosomal “dominant” inheritance, and review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology 1995;42:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 182
    
183.
Summerfield JA, Nagafuchi Y, Sherlock S, Cadafalch J, Scheuer PJ. Hepatobiliary fibropolycystic diseases. A clinical and histological review of 51 patients. J Hepatol 1986;2:141-56.  Back to cited text no. 183
    
184.
Watanatittan S, Niramis R. Choledochal cyst: Review of 74 pediatric cases. J Med Assoc Thai 1998;81:586-95.  Back to cited text no. 184
    
185.
Moslim MA, Takahashi H, Seifarth FG, Walsh RM, Morris-Stiff G. Choledochal cyst disease in a western center: A 30-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20:1453-63.  Back to cited text no. 185
    
186.
Chijiiwa K, Koga A. Surgical management and long-term follow-up of patients with choledochal cysts. Am J Surg 1993;165:238-42.  Back to cited text no. 186
    
187.
Kremer AE, Beuers U, Oude-Elferink RP, Pusl T. Pathogenesis and treatment of pruritus in cholestasis. Drugs 2008;68:2163-82.  Back to cited text no. 187
    
188.
Prince MI, Burt AD, Jones DE. Hepatitis and liver dysfunction with rifampicin therapy for pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gut 2002;50:436-9.  Back to cited text no. 188
    
189.
Datta DV, Sherlock S. Cholestyramine for long term relief of the pruritus complicating intrahepatic cholestasis. Gastroenterology 1966;50:323-32.  Back to cited text no. 189
    
190.
Rust C, Sauter GH, Oswald M, Büttner J, Kullak-Ublick GA, Paumgartner G, et al. Effect of cholestyramine on bile acid pattern and synthesis during administration of ursodeoxycholic acid in man. Eur J Clin Invest 2000;30:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 190
    
191.
Khurana S, Singh P. Rifampin is safe for treatment of pruritus due to chronic cholestasis: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized-controlled trials. Liver Int 2006;26:943-8.  Back to cited text no. 191
    
192.
Tandon P, Rowe BH, Vandermeer B, Bain VG. The efficacy and safety of bile Acid binding agents, opioid antagonists, or rifampin in the treatment of cholestasis-associated pruritus. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1528-36.  Back to cited text no. 192
    
193.
Bachs L, Parés A, Elena M, Piera C, Rodés J. Effects of long-term rifampicin administration in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1992;102:2077-80.  Back to cited text no. 193
    
194.
Jones EA, Dekker LR. Florid opioid withdrawal-like reaction precipitated by naltrexone in a patient with chronic cholestasis. Gastroenterology 2000;118:431-2.  Back to cited text no. 194
    
195.
de Vries E, Bolier R, Goet J, Parés A, Verbeek J, de Vree M, et al. Fibrates for itch (FITCH) in fibrosing cholangiopathies: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2021;160:734-43.e6.  Back to cited text no. 195
    
196.
Mayo MJ, Handem I, Saldana S, Jacobe H, Getachew Y, Rush AJ. Sertraline as a first-line treatment for cholestatic pruritus. Hepatology 2007;45:666-74.  Back to cited text no. 196
    
197.
Parés A, Cisneros L, Salmerón JM, Caballería L, Mas A, Torras A, et al. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis: A procedure for prolonged relief of intractable pruritus in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1105-10.  Back to cited text no. 197
    
198.
Pusl T, Denk GU, Parhofer KG, Beuers U. Plasma separation and anion adsorption transiently relieve intractable pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2006;45:887-91.  Back to cited text no. 198
    
199.
Alallam A, Barth D, Heathcote EJ. Role of plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe pruritus in pregnant patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: Case reports. Can J Gastroenterol 2008;22:505-7.  Back to cited text no. 199
    
200.
Beuers U, Gerken G, Pusl T. Biliary drainage transiently relieves intractable pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2006;44:280-1.  Back to cited text no. 200
    
201.
Gross CR, Malinchoc M, Kim WR, Evans RW, Wiesner RH, Petz JL, et al. Quality of life before and after liver transplantation for cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology 1999;29:356-64.  Back to cited text no. 201
    
202.
Jones DE. Fatigue in cholestatic liver disease: Is it all in the mind? J Hepatol 2007;46:992-4.  Back to cited text no. 202
    
203.
Newton JL, Pairman J, Sutcliffe K, Wilton K, Jones DE. A predictive model for fatigue and its etiologic associations in primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:228-33.  Back to cited text no. 203
    
204.
Jones DE, Sutcliffe K, Pairman J, Wilton K, Newton JL. An integrated care pathway improves quality of life in primary biliary cirrhosis. QJM 2008;101:535-43.  Back to cited text no. 204
    
205.
Silveira MG, Gossard AA, Stahler AC, Jorgensen RA, Petz JL, Ali AH, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of efficacy and safety: Modafinil in the treatment of fatigue in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Ther 2017;24:e167-76.  Back to cited text no. 205
    
206.
Pares A, Guanabens N. Osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Pathogenesis and treatment. Clin Liver Dis 2008;12:407-24; x.  Back to cited text no. 206
    
207.
Pereira SP, O'Donohue J, Moniz C, Phillips MG, Abraha H, Buxton-Thomas M, et al. Transdermal hormone replacement therapy improves vertebral bone density in primary biliary cirrhosis: Results of a 1-year controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:563-70.  Back to cited text no. 207
    
208.
Boone RH, Cheung AM, Girlan LM, Heathcote EJ. Osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: A randomized trial of the efficacy and feasibility of estrogen/progestin. Dig Dis Sci 2006;51:1103-12.  Back to cited text no. 208
    
209.
Musialik J, Petelenz M, Gonciarz Z. Effects of alendronate on bone mass in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and osteoporosis: Preliminary results after one year. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:873-4.  Back to cited text no. 209
    
210.
Guañabens N, Parés A, Ros I, Alvarez L, Pons F, Caballería L, et al. Alendronate is more effective than etidronate for increasing bone mass in osteopenic patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2268-74.  Back to cited text no. 210
    
211.
Newton J, Francis R, Prince M, James O, Bassendine M, Rawlings D, et al. Osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis revisited. Gut 2001;49:282-7.  Back to cited text no. 211
    
212.
Ungprasert P, Wijarnpreecha K, Ahuja W, Spanuchart I, Thongprayoon C. Coronary artery disease in primary biliary cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Hepatol Res 2015;45:1055-61.  Back to cited text no. 212
    
213.
Nakamuta M, Enjoji M, Kotoh K, Shimohashi N, Tanabe Y. Long-term fibrate treatment for PBC. J Gastroenterol 2005;40:546-7.  Back to cited text no. 213
    
214.
Chalasani N. Statins and hepatotoxicity: Focus on patients with fatty liver. Hepatology 2005;41:690-5.  Back to cited text no. 214
    
215.
Corpechot C, Abenavoli L, Rabahi N, Chrétien Y, Andréani T, Johanet C, et al. Biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid and long-term prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2008;48:871-7.  Back to cited text no. 215
    
216.
Kumagi T, Guindi M, Fischer SE, Arenovich T, Abdalian R, Coltescu C, et al. Baseline ductopenia and treatment response predict long-term histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2186-94.  Back to cited text no. 216
    
217.
Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Poupon R. Early primary biliary cirrhosis: biochemical response to treatment and prediction of long-term outcome. J Hepatol 2011;55:1361-7.  Back to cited text no. 217
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohammad Mawardi
Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Gastroenterology Section, Jeddah - 23431
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_112_21

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cholangitis: Experience from a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia
AhmedH AlWabel, Musthafa Peedikayil, Sulaiman AlNasser, Khalid AlHusaini, Othman AlHekail, SalehA Alqahtani, IbrahimH AlTraif, Hamad AlAshgar
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022; 0(0): 0
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Primary Biliary ...
    Primary Sclerosi...
    Overlap Syndrome...
    Autoimmune Hepat...
    Autoimmune Hepat...
    Autoimmune Hepat...
    IGG4-Related Scl...
    Cholestatic Drug...
    Cholestatic Live...
    Genetic Cholesta...
    FibrO-Polycystic...
    Management of Ex...
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2435    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded383    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal