|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 85-91
|N-acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen induced acute liver failure: A review
Shirley Xue Jiang1, Trana Hussaini2, Eric M. Yoshida3
1 Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
3 Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Click here for correspondence address and email
|Date of Submission||26-Jul-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||30-Oct-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||07-Feb-2022|
| Abstract|| |
The use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure (NAI-ALF) has been increasing despite controversy in its efficacy. National guidelines are in disagreement for NAC use as standard of care; however, many healthcare centers continue to adopt the use of NAC outside of acetaminophen poisoning. While NAC may have multiple mechanisms of action in treatment of ALF, this has not translated to clinical benefit. Murine models have reported antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as improvement in liver-specific microcirculation. Multiple case studies and series have reported positive outcomes of NAC treatment for ALF of various etiologies. While prospective studies suggested the benefit of NAC treatment, these studies have methodological and statistical shortcomings that affect the validity of the results. In this review, we aimed to summarize the existing literature on the efficacy of NAC for NAI-ALF including mechanism of action, case studies and series demonstrating outcomes, and prospective studies that have led to its current widespread use, along with the reported rate of adverse events.
Keywords: Acetylcysteine, acute liver failure, clinical pharmacology, liver
|How to cite this article:|
Jiang SX, Hussaini T, Yoshida EM. N-acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen induced acute liver failure: A review. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022;28:85-91
| Introduction|| |
Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rapidly-progressive illness of hepatic dysfunction accompanied by encephalopathy and coagulopathy, with a high incidence of multi-organ failure and death. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment for acetaminophen-induced ALF is clearly established; however, its use for non-acetaminophen-induced ALF (NAI-ALF) is not definitively supported by existing evidence. Nevertheless, there has been increasing use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in NAI-ALF over the past two decades despite controversy in its role outside of acetaminophen overdose.
The uncertainty of NAC treatment for NAI-ALF is reflected in prominent guidelines. The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines advise NAC treatment in early-stage ALF of all causes, including NAI-ALF, as standard of care. The American Association of the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines state that NAC may improve survival during early stages of hepatic encephalopathy and may benefit ALF associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI). NAC treatment is recommended for ALF due to mushroom poisoning; however, there is no specific recommendation for NAC in other causes of NAI-ALF. In contrast, the American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) 2017 guidelines state that NAC treatment for NAI-ALF should be limited to clinical trials only.
Multiple reviews investigating the efficacy of NAC treatment for NAI-ALF have concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend its routine use. Two reviews, which included two prospective cohort studies in adults with NAI-ALF, made no recommendation for NAC due to multiple areas of bias in existing studies., In a meta-analysis of two adult and two pediatric studies, there was no significant improvement in overall survival with NAC treatment though there was suggestion of better transplant-free survival and post-transplant survival. Another review specifically studied NAC treatment for NAI-DILI leading to ALF, but was too underpowered to draw conclusions. The most recent systematic reviews appear to provide conflicting conclusions. In 2020, Siu et al. conducted a Cochrane systematic review on NAC in NAI-ALF including only one adult trial, and deemed the evidence to be inconclusive due to the risk of bias and imprecision. Contrastingly, Shrestha et al. conducted a meta-analysis of NAC in acute liver injury in pediatric and adult populations and found mortality benefit in NAC use; however, on closer examination, this finding did not reach significance when including only randomized trials. While these reviews provide a summary of evidence, their findings require contextualization and critical appraisal before they can be clinically applied.
Proposed mechanism of action in ALF
Animal models have studied possible mechanisms of NAC in ALF, whereby oxidative injury leads to hepatocyte apoptosis and mitochondrial failure [Figure 1]. NAC has been shown to have antioxidant properties beyond acting as a precursor to glutathione. In a mouse model of ALF, NAC treatment attenuated hepatocyte apoptosis resulting from oxidative stress. Further, NAC has been shown to improve mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse models of liver injury., NAC also exhibits an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting activation of toll-like receptors and lowering systemic cytokine levels. This anti-inflammatory effect was shown to normalize mice cerebral edema and decrease neutrophil infiltration of the liver, which mitigates hepatocyte death.
ALF is also associated with tissue hypoxia, which has been shown to improve with NAC treatment in early physiologic studies. After NAC administration to ALF patients, Harrison et al. observed improved oxygen delivery and consumption, though this effect was diminished in patients with NAI-ALF. While cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) is elevated during ALF, a further increase in cGMP was observed after NAC treatment, leading to the proposal that improved oxygenation was secondary to cGMP-induced vasodilation. This result was criticized as studies by Harrison et al. utilized the Fick method to calculate oxygen consumption, which is prone to false elevations., Other studies that directly measured systemic oxygen delivery and consumption found no improvement of oxygenation with NAC treatment. Nonetheless, there may be a specific effect in hepatosplanchnic circulation as subsequent studies measured improved blood flow index and associated increased hepatic clearance after NAC treatment. As such, NAC treatment likely improves liver-specific circulation, but none of these effects have translated to clinical outcomes.
Clinical Studies: Case Reports and Case Series
Some case studies and series suggest that NAC treatment in NAI-ALF is effective in the early stages of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). In a case series of eight adults in Sri Lanka with dengue-associated ALF treated with NAC infusions, recovery was seen in patients with grade I-II HE. Similarly, another case series in Israel including seven adults with NAI-ALF treated with intravenous or oral NAC, showed clinical recovery and reversal of coagulopathy in three patients with grade 0–II HE (a fourth patient recovered but died from unrelated causes), though it is unclear whether recovered patients had acute liver injury that was spontaneously reversible or had liver failure that would have been irreversible if NAC had not been provided. Further, the reversal of coagulopathy is of unclear significance as NAC treatment has been shown to increase clotting factors in healthy participants with no liver injury.
Multiple case studies have demonstrated outcomes of NAC treatment in NAI-ALF, ranging from DILI, shock liver, and infectious causes [Table 1]. Outcomes are generally positive with complete clinical and biochemical resolution; however, there are also reports of death due to ALF or mortality from other causes. There are also several studies of NAC treatment for ALF in the pediatric population of various etiologies, which have led to conflicting results that may not be directly comparable to the adult population [Table 2].[32–35]
Although these case reports and series are clinically interesting, hypothesis-generating, and suggest the potential for benefit, without a comparator control group of patients on non-NAC standard care alone, it is impossible to determine whether NAC treatment was definitely beneficial.
Clinical studies: Prospective studies
Prospective cohort studies suggesting the benefit of NAC in NAI-ALF are limited in size and heterogeneity [Table 2]. Mumtaz et al. preformed a prospective cohort study in Pakistan of oral NAC treatment for NAI-ALF, where ALF was mainly secondary to viral hepatitis (HEV, HBV) and DILI. Compared to a historical control group, NAC treatment was associated with a higher survival rate (47% vs. 27%, P = 0.05). The authors acknowledge that there were advances in critical care during the study period, rendering the historical control incomparable, especially as the control group had more deaths attributed to “sepsis/multiorgan failure.”
A similar prospective cohort study was conducted in Kuwait by Darweesh et al. However, the majority of their participants did not have encephalopathy at enrolment, which represents a major departure from other studies adhering to the strict definition of ALF. Compared with historical controls, Darweesh et al. reported significantly improved transplant-free survival with NAC treatment (96.4% vs. 23.3%, P < 0.01), and no further analysis was conducted given their substantial result. The transplant-free survival with NAC dramatically exceeds the results of other studies and the authors attributed this to using significantly higher doses of NAC treatment.
Randomized controlled trials
The most rigorous and commonly referenced study reporting benefit of NAC in NAI-ALF is by Lee et al. in 2009. This prospective, double-blind, randomized study, included 24 centers across the US from 1998 to 2006, and enrolled 173 patients with NAI-ALF. Eighty-one patients were treated with NAC. The etiologies of ALF were predominantly DILI, unknown, HBV, and autoimmune hepatitis. The primary endpoint of overall survival at 3 weeks was not significantly improved with NAC treatment (70%, 95% CI: 60–81) compared to the control group (66%, 95% CI: 56–77, one-sided P = 0.2). The secondary endpoint of transplant-free survival was significantly higher in NAC group (40%, 95% CI: 28–51) compared to the control group (27%, 95% CI: 18–37, one-sided P = 0.043). This effect was emphasized in grade I-II HE with an odds ratio of 2.46 (95% CI: 1.14–5.30) compared to HE grade III-IV (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.06–1.74). Further analysis performed on the same dataset found that transplantation or death is associated with higher ALT and advanced HE. Higher IL-17 concentration was inversely associated with transplant-free survival in both NAC and placebo patients.
The trial by Lee et al. has been criticized in subsequent literature. The foremost issue is use of one-sided P values for overall survival and transplant-free survival instead of the standard two-sided test, that has become accepted as the conventional level of significance (i.e., P = 0.05 for a one-sided test becomes 0.10 when one uses the conventional two-sided test). When Siu et al. re-analyzed data using two-sided P values, they could not replicate the original findings, including the subgroup analysis of transplant-free survival by coma grade. Further, there was no adjustment for multiple comparisons, leading to increased risk of false positive results. Another consideration is that nine participants were excluded despite the intention-to-treat analysis. However, Siu et al. performed a “best-worst/worst-best case scenario” analysis and found no change in the effect, suggesting low risk of attrition bias. Lastly, Siu et al. found reporting bias due to omission of one-year outcomes.
International RCTs studying the effect of NAC on NAI-ALF have also suggested a survival benefit but require a critical appraisal. Nabi et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial in India on the efficacy of NAC infusion in NAI-ALF. The etiology was primarily unknown, DILI, and HEV. On univariate analysis, the NAC group had an improved survival (72.5% vs. 47.5% in the placebo group, P = 0.025), though when stratified by etiology, only the DILI group retained slightly superior outcomes with NAC (P = 0.049). It is unreported if adjustments were made for multiple comparisons for this marginal P value. On logistic regression analysis, predictors of mortality included NAC treatment (adjusted OR: 4.6, P = 0.01), grade I-II HE (adjusted OR: 5.254, P = 0.007), and presence of ascites (adjusted OR: 7.077, P = 0.034). Unfortunately, the lack of reporting in methodology limits validity of the results. There was unclear allocation concealment and blinding, which can lead to selection bias especially as there were significant differences in baseline clinicodemographic factors between treatment arms. There was also no reporting of loss-to-follow-up, intention-to-treat design, or stated predefined outcomes to assess for reporting bias.
Nabi et al. further studied NAC treatment in viral-specific ALF, predominantly HEV, HBV, and HAV, in a similar population to their 2017 study. The primary analysis showed no significant survival benefit with NAC (61.1% vs. 31.6% in the control group, P = 0.079). On subgroup analysis of HEV patients, the NAC group had improved survival (90% vs. 37.5% in the control group, P = 0.022). This study faced similar limitations in reporting and methodology.
Adverse events associated with NAC
The above-mentioned clinical studies of NAC treatment report different adverse events, which may be due to differences in dose and formulation [Table 3]. Lee et al. reported higher incidence of nausea and vomiting in the NAC treated group (14% vs. 4% in the control group, P = 0.03), with other adverse events being similar between both treatment. Using the same intravenous NAC protocol, Nabi et al. reported no adverse events. Mumtaz et al. used oral NAC and found the most common adverse event was vomiting (8%), followed by rash (4%) and transient bronchospasm (2%). Darweesh et al. used considerably higher doses of NAC compared to other studies and found 96.4% of patients with NAC treatment had prolonged cholestasis with elevated bilirubin for 2–3 months. The authors noted that prolonged cholestasis was not seen in the placebo group, concluding that this was not due to natural sequelae of ALF. Other adverse events included allergic reaction (10%) and dyspepsia (13%).
Compared to existing literature, the adverse events noted in the above-mentioned prospective studies are similar except for prolonged cholestasis, which has not been previously reported. The most commonly reported adverse events in NAC treatment are mild anaphylactoid reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and rash, though more severe reactions can include angioedema, bronchospasm, and hypotension.
| Conclusion|| |
While there is a suggested benefit of NAC treatment in NAI-ALF given the demonstrated effects in early physiology studies, this has not translated to conclusive evidence of benefit in clinical studies. The published clinical studies are limited by the heterogeneity of NAC dose and duration, patient selection factors, etiology of NAI-ALF, and use of historical controls. The best evidence to date is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized trial by Lee et al.; however, the transplant-free survival benefit in early HE could not be re-demonstrated using more conventional analysis.
The efficacy of NAC for NAI-ALF remains unclear and requires more rigorous investigation. While there is no clear and unequivocal benefit, there also appear to be few adverse effects at studied doses, as well as the drug being relatively inexpensive, readily available, and simple to administer. It is important to clarify the role of NAC in NAI-ALF, especially in the treatment of patients who do not qualify for liver transplant or in low-resource settings where transplantation is not accessible.
Ultimately, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest routine clinical use of NAC for NAI-ALF given the lack of demonstrated clinical benefit. Importantly, omission of NAC in NAI-ALF cannot be regarded as a breach of reasonable care, and clinicians should not be criticized for electing not to administer it. On the other hand, with few adverse drug effects and reasonable costs, clinicians may choose to administer NAC on the grounds that often the exact etiology of acute liver failure is not known and occult acetaminophen use may still have been a factor in the patient's clinical situation; that is to say, there is no harm in giving it and it is better to “cover all bases.” Clinical use of NAC in NAI-ALF, however, should follow individualized discussion with patients and families for informed consent to use this medication off-label for this indication. Further study is needed, especially randomized clinical trials to provide an unequivocal answer regarding clinical benefit.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Keays R, Harrison PM, Wendon JA, Forbes A, Gove C, Alexander GJ, et al
. Intravenous acetylcysteine in paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure: A prospective controlled trial. BMJ 1991;303:1026-9.
Reuben A, Tillman H, Fontana RJ, Davern T, McGuire B, Stravitz RT, et al
. Outcomes in adults with acute liver failure between 1998 and 2013: An observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:724.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Clinical practice guidelines panel, Wendon J, Panel members, Cordoba J, Dhawan A, Larsen FS, et al
. EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines on the management of acute (fulminant) liver failure. J Hepatol. 2017;66:1047-81.
Montaninia S, Sinardia D, Praticò C, Sinardia A, Trimarchi G. Use of Acetylcysteine as the Life-saving Antidote in Amanita phalloides (Death Cap) Poisoning. Arzneimittelforschung 2011;49:1044-7.
Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larson AM. Introduction to the revised American Association for the study of liver diseases position paper on acute liver failure 2011. Hepatology 2012;55:965-7.
Flamm SL, Yang YX, Singh S, Falck-Ytter YT, AGA Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 2017;152:644-7.
Sales I, Dzierba AL, Smithburger PL, Rowe D, Kane-Gill SL. Use of acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Ann Hepatol 2013;12:6-10.
Hu J, Zhang Q, Ren X, Sun Z, Quan Q. Efficacy and safety of acetylcysteine in “non-acetaminophen” acute liver failure: A meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2015;39:594-9.
Chughlay MF, Kramer N, Spearman CW, Werfalli M, Cohen K. N-acetylcysteine for non-paracetamol drug-induced liver injury: A systematic review: N-acetylcysteine for non-paracetamol drug-induced liver injury. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016;81:1021-9.
Lee WM, Hynan LS, Rossaro L, Fontana RJ, Stravitz RT, Larson AM, et al
. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine improves transplant-free survival in early stage non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 2009;137:856-64.e1.
Siu JT, Nguyen T, Turgeon RD. N-acetylcysteine for non-paracetamol (acetaminophen)-related acute liver failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD012123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012123.pub2.
Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Sedhai YR, Adhikari A, Poudel A, Aryal B, et al
. N-acetyl cysteine versus standard of care for non-acetaminophen induced acute liver injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol 2021;24:100340.
Riordan SM. Mechanisms of hepatocyte injury, multiorgan failure, and prognostic criteria in acute liver failure. Semin Liver Dis 2003;23:203-16.
Alonso A, Lau J, Jaber BL, Weintraub A, Sarnak MJ. Prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine in patients with chronic kidney disease: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43:1-9.
San-Miguel B, Alvarez M, Culebras JM, González-Gallego J, Tuñón MJ. N-acetyl-cysteine protects liver from apoptotic death in an animal model of fulminant hepatic failure. Apoptosis 2006;11:1945-57.
Zwingmann C, Bilodeau M. Metabolic insights into the hepatoprotective role of N-acetylcysteine in mouse liver. Hepatology 2006;43:454-63.
Chen Y, Johansson E, Yang Y, Miller ML, Shen D, Orlicky DJ, et al
. Oral N-acetylcysteine rescues lethality of hepatocyte-specific Gclc-knockout mice, providing a model for hepatic cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2010;53:1085-94.
Jin X, Wang L, Wu H-S, Zhang L, Wang CY, Tian Y, et al
. N-acetylcysteine inhibits activation of toll-like receptor 2 and 4 gene expression in the liver and lung after partial hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2007;6:284-9.
Bémeur C, Vaquero J, Desjardins P, Butterworth RF. N-Acetylcysteine attenuates cerebral complications of non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in mice: Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Metab Brain Dis 2010;25:241-9.
Marques PE, Amaral SS, Pires DA, Nogueira LL, Soriani FM, Lima BH, et al
. Chemokines and mitochondrial products activate neutrophils to amplify organ injury during mouse acute liver failure. Hepatology 2012;56:1971-82.
Harrison PM, Wendon JA, Gimson AE, Alexander GJ, Williams R. Improvement by acetylcysteine of hemodynamics and oxygen transport in fulminant hepatic failure. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1852-7.
Schneider F, Lutun P, Boudjema K, Wolf P, Tempé J-D. In vivo
evidence of enhanced guanylyl cyclase activation during the hyperdynamic circulation of acute liver failure. Hepatology 1994;19:38-44.
Harrison P, Wendon J, Williams R. Evidence of increased guanylate cyclase activation by acetylcysteine in fulminant hepatic failure. Hepatology 1996;23:1067-72.
Gasman JD, Ruoss SJ, Fishman RS, Rizk NW, Raffin TA. Hazards with both determining and utilizing oxygen consumption measurements in the management of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1996;24:6-9.
Hanique G, Dugernier T, Laterre PF, Dougnac A, Roeseler J, Reynaert MS. Significance of pathologic oxygen supply dependency in critically ill patients: Comparison between measured and calculated methods. Intensive Care Med 1994;20:12-8.
Walsh TS, Hopton P, Philips BJ, Mackenzie SJ, Lee A. The effect ofN-acetylcysteine on oxygen transport and uptake in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. Hepatology 1998;27:1332-40.
Rank N, Michel C, Haertel C, Welte M, Meier-Hellmann A, Spies C. N-acetylcysteine increases liver blood ﬂow and improves liver function in septic shock patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3799-807.
Sklar GE, Subramaniam M. Acetylcysteine treatment for non–acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:498-501.
Kumarasena RS, Mananjala Senanayake S, Sivaraman K, de Silva AP, Dassanayake AS, Premaratna R, et al
. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine in dengue-associated acute liver failure. Hepatol Int 2010;4:533-4.
Ben-Ari Z, Vaknin H, Tur-Kaspa R. N-acetylcysteine in acute hepatic failure (non-paracetamol-induced). Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:786-9.
Knudsen TT. Effect of intravenous N-acetylcysteine infusion on haemostatic parameters in healthy subjects. Gut 2005;54:515-21.
Squires RH, Dhawan A, Alonso E, Narkewicz MR, Shneider BL, Rodriguez-Baez N, et al
. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine in pediatric patients with non-acetaminophen acute liver failure: A placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hepatology 2013;57:1542-9.
Kortsalioudaki C, Taylor RM, Cheeseman P, Bansal S, Mieli-Vergani G, Dhawan A. Safety and efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in children with non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Liver Transpl 2008;14:25-30.
Senanayake MP, Jayamanne MD, Kankananarachchi I. N-acetylcysteine in children with acute liver failure complicating dengue viral infection. Ceylon Med J 2013;58:80-2.
Hassen GW, Dhaliwal A, Jenninigs CA, Kalantari H. The role of acetyl cysteine in cocaethylene (non-acetaminophen) acute liver failure. Case Rep Emerg Med 2018;2018:4393064.
Zhang X, Burroughs S, Farooq A, Bashir MR, Muir AJ, Patel YA. N-acetylcysteine in the management of acute liver failure from sickle cell hepatic crisis. ACG Case Rep J 2019;6:e00161.
Abeysekera R, Illangasekera U, Jayalath T, Sandeepana A, Kularatne S. Successful use of intravenous N-acetylcysteine in dengue haemorrhagic fever with acute liver failure. Ceylon Med J 2013;57:166.
Manoj E, Ranasinghe G, Ragunathan M. Successful use of N-acetyl cysteine and activated recombinant factor VII in fulminant hepatic failure and massive bleeding secondary to dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2014;7:313.
] [Full text]
Dalugama C, Gawarammana IB. Dengue hemorrhagic fever complicated with acute liver failure: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2017;11:341.
Dissanayake DM, Gunaratne WM, Kumarihamy KW, Kularatne SA, Kumarasiri PV. Use of intravenous N-acetylcysteine in acute severe hepatitis due to severe dengue infection: A case series. BMC Infect Dis 2021;21:978.
Parvataneni S, Vemuri-Reddy SM. N-acetyl cysteine use in the treatment of shock liver. Cureus 2020;12:e7149.
Brown P, Jones D, Hassan M, Moonka D. Crizotinib-induced fulminant liver failure. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:S1273.
Adhikari N, Kumar P, Venkatesulu BP, Pandey R, Haresh KP, Gupta S, et al
. Crizotinib-induced fulminant hepatic failure: A rare adverse event. J Glob Oncol 2018;1-4. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.007765.
Cheung MC, Jones RL, Judson I. Acute liver toxicity with ifosfamide in the treatment of sarcoma: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:180.
Elliott TR, Symes T, Kannourakis G, Angus P. Resolution of norfloxacin-induced acute liver failure after N-acetylcysteine therapy: Further support for the use of NAC in drug-induced ALF? BMJ Case Rep 2016;2016:bcr2015213189.
Fox AN, Nation BE, Autry MT, Johnson PN. Possible role for acetylcysteine as a treatment for acute liver failure secondary to antitubercular medication use. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020;77:1482-7.
Carothers C, Birrer K, Vo M. Acetylcysteine for the treatment of suspected remdesivir-associated acute liver failure in COVID-19: A case series. Pharmacotherapy 2020;40:1166-71.
Mumtaz K, Azam Z, Hamid S, Abid S, Memon S, Ali Shah H, et al
. Role of N-acetylcysteine in adults with non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in a center without the facility of liver transplantation. Hepatol Int 2009;3:563-70.
Kortsalioudaki C, Taylor RM, Cheeseman P, Bansal S, Mieli-Vergani G, Dhawan A. Safety and efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in children with non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Liver Transpl 2008;14:25-30.
Darweesh SK, Ibrahim MF, El-Tahawy MA. Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on mortality and liver transplantation rate in non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: A multicenter study. Clin Drug Investig 2017;37:473-82.
The Acute Liver Failure Study Group, Singh S, Hynan LS, Lee WM. Improvements in hepatic serological biomarkers are associated with clinical benefit of intravenous N-acetylcysteine in early stage Non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:1397-402.
Stravitz RT, Sanyal AJ, Reisch J, Bajaj JS, Mirshahi F, Cheng J, et al
. Effects of N
-acetylcysteine on cytokines in non-acetaminophen acute liver failure: Potential mechanism of improvement in transplant-free survival. Liver Int 2013;33:1324-31.
Nabi T, Nabi S, Rafiq N, Shah A. Role of N-acetylcysteine treatment in non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: A prospective study. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2017;23:169-75.
] [Full text]
Nabi T, Rafiq N. N-acetylcysteine treatment in viral-induced acute liver failure. Int J Clin Trials 2019;6:106.
Bebarta VS, Kao L, Froberg B, Clark RF, Lavonas E, Qi M, et al
. A multicenter comparison of the safety of oral versus intravenous acetylcysteine for treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Clin Toxicol 2010;48:424-30.
Sandilands EA, Bateman DN. Adverse reactions associated with acetylcysteine. Clin Toxicol 2009;47:81-8.
Dr. Eric M. Yoshida
Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, 5th floor-2775 Laurel St., Vancouver, BC
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1848 |
| Printed||43 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||207 |
| Comments ||[Add] |