Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 422 


 
Table of Contents   
NEW HORIZON  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 413-416
The NAFLD–MAFLD debate through the lens of the Arab world


1 Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt
2 Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Cairo, Egypt
3 Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission12-Jul-2022
Date of Acceptance14-Aug-2022
Date of Web Publication16-Sep-2022
 

   Abstract 


The most common liver disease in the world is fatty liver disease related to metabolic dysfunction, yet neither patients nor medical professionals are fully aware of this. The disease, formerly known for decades as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has been renamed metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), with many international consensus groups making recommendations on how the condition should be diagnosed and treated. This point of view explores the nomenclature change from the standpoint of Arab medical professionals and patients. The call for a name change brought up serious issues with the current nomenclature, which refers to the condition as NAFLD, and its diagnostic criteria, including the necessity for excluding alcohol consumption. The Arab world has its unique situation as regards both old and new nomenclatures. This is because of the low alcohol consumption rates in most Arab Muslim countries besides the reported high prevalence rates of obesity and its related comorbidities in the region. In our opinion, such unclarities acted as a significant roadblock to several crucial aspects of disease management in the Arab countries, including patient–doctor communication, patient awareness, partnership working, patient motivation to make lifestyle changes, and promotion of multiple health behavior changes. Many Arab world hepatologists thus wholeheartedly endorse this call to redefine the disease as they believe it will eventually positively impact the understanding and awareness of fatty liver disease, enhance patient treatment and quality of life, and reduce the load on the healthcare system.

Keywords: Arab, fatty liver, MAFLD, NAFLD, obesity

How to cite this article:
Tharwat M, Medhat MA, El-Kassas M. The NAFLD–MAFLD debate through the lens of the Arab world. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022;28:413-6

How to cite this URL:
Tharwat M, Medhat MA, El-Kassas M. The NAFLD–MAFLD debate through the lens of the Arab world. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 27];28:413-6. Available from: https://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2022/28/6/413/356200




Many diseases have had their names changed throughout time, and for a name change to be effective, it must make sense, be simple to say and type, get support from professional bodies, and maintain the same acronym. A change in a disease's name often denotes a better knowledge of the condition, whether in terms of its clinical manifestations, natural history, or pathophysiological features. The trials for changing the nomenclature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have raised much debate and interest about the impact of this change on disease management, course, and prognosis. The definition of NAFLD was proposed and remained unchanged since 1986, defined by the presence of evident hepatic steatosis (by imaging or histology) and absence of other causes of hepatic fat accumulation, such as significant alcohol intake, long-term use of a steatogenic drug, or hereditary disorders.[1]According to this definition, the diagnosis of NAFLD is a diagnosis of exclusion.[2] Moreover, this requires an exhaustive workup to exclude many diseases and neglect the association between some diseases and steatosis, such as the hepatitis C virus.[3],[4] The main differences between NAFDL and MAFLD definitions are listed in [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of the main differences between NAFLD and MAFLD definitions

Click here to view


There is a global debate about this medical term. The “non-” prefix is usually used to describe a minor condition and distinguish it from a more critical condition. In the case of NAFLD, this is responsible for trivializing the disease.[5]Also, exclusion of alcohol intake is problematic[1] as there is no objective uniform standard for determining significant alcohol intake.[6],[7] The role of alcohol as a cause of the liver disease is variable according to many factors, and it is clearly observed that Arab countries have a lower prevalence of alcohol use than western countries due to cultural and religious differences, as alcohol is prohibited in Islam, the predominant religion of the region.[8] Moreover, the term NAFLD confuses patients about the real cause of their disease.[9]

For the reasons mentioned above, Eslam et al.[10] proposed the change in the terminology of NAFLD to MAFLD in 2020. The diagnostic criteria for MAFLD include the presence of hepatic steatosis with one of the three following criteria: obesity or overweight, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. These criteria are more practical, simple, and easy to apply. This helps deal with the whole patient rather than focusing on a specific organ. Therefore, MAFLD captures the entire disease spectrum.[11] This term has been significantly accepted among patients,[12] physicians,[13] nurses, and other liver societies.[14]

This new definition helps detect the effect of more than one chronic liver disease or a metabolic abnormality present simultaneously in a single patient,[15] such as alcohol, virus infection, or drugs.[16] Also, this allowed adding more subjects who fulfilled the definition of MAFLD but not the NAFLD criteria. Therefore, we can expect an increase in the prevalence of fatty liver disease by at least 25% after applying the new definition;[17] however, the situation may be different in the Arab countries. The multiplicity of the criteria required for diagnosing MAFLD makes it challenging to precisely predict the increase in the disease prevalence with the new definition. In addition, lean patients with fatty liver are expected to be under-recognized due to the absence of the classical risk factors that allow the detection of such cases. A recently published study found that NAFLD exists in 31.6% of young Egyptian adults[18] and 57.65% of obese Egyptian adolescents.[19] NAFLD was also found to affect one-quarter of the population in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.[20] The expected increase in the prevalence of fatty liver disease, after the definition change, is a concern in Arab countries, where massive growth in population exceeds the capacity of healthcare systems, which are already fragile and under-resourced.[21]

This high prevalence of fatty liver disease in Arab countries could be attributed to many factors, such as excess carbohydrate and fast-food intake, high-calorie energy intake, decrease in fresh fruits and vegetable intake, decreased physical activity, the habit of sedentary behavior, and so on,[22],[23] with a rapid increase in the rate of obesity among the Arab population. Egypt, as an example, shows higher rates of obesity among women compared with men due to cultural aspects.[24],[25] Also, there is a spike in the prevalence of diabetes in the Middle East. The Gulf region has experienced a sudden increase in the rates of diabetes, with Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain ranking among the top 10 countries with the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes worldwide.[26] For example, the prevalence of DM increased dramatically in Saudi Arabia to reach 25.4% of the population.[27] Egypt was ranked ninth in the number of diabetes cases, with a prevalence of 15.56% among adults.[28]

Although there are scant data on the magnitude of MAFLD in the Arab world, available data suggest that Egypt has one of the highest prevalence of MAFLD, affecting more than one-third of the population, compared to a global prevalence of about 25%.[29],[30] However, this is likely to be underestimated because of under-diagnosis and under-reporting. In response to the alarming increase in NAFLD prevalence and the proposed change in the landscape of liver diseases in Egypt over the last decade, a clinical practice guideline for MAFLD screening, diagnosis, and management was recently issued by a group of Egyptian opinion leaders.[31] This guidance aimed to consider the local situation and the burden of clinical management of NAFLD for the healthcare sector.

The change in nomenclature from NAFLD to MAFLD could be of value in clinical practice at multiple levels, including patient diagnosis, care, and research. Also, it has great value in clinical communication.[14] However, the term still leaves significant ambiguity due to many debatable points. First, the new term is associated with a lack of awareness by many physicians. This may result in mismanagement of the disease, which will affect its prognosis.[2] Also, other “metabolic” diseases such as Wilson's disease may result in fatty liver but are not covered under the term MAFLD.[32] Moreover, NAFLD patients with non-metabolic risk are missed as they do not fulfill the MAFLD criteria. Unfortunately, their potential risk can be the cause of future diseases.[33] Therefore, some experts believe that now is not the time to endorse the new term that needs to be corrected as the disease's understanding continues to improve.[34],[35]

Regardless of the proper name describing this real disease, we know well that it is going to be the most significant liver disease with related morbidity and mortality worldwide. In reality though, we are challenged to identify and manage it. Therefore, a name change should follow a clearer understanding of disease nature, pathogenesis, and management. It is not the name but the disease's nature that decides the patient outcome.

In conclusion, the outdated term “NAFLD” exaggerates the role of alcohol consumption, which is not a primary cause of liver disease in many regions, including the Muslim Arab world, while downplaying the significance of metabolic dysfunction in this disease. The definition of MAFLD is straightforward, practical, and performs better than the previous NAFLD definition in identifying patients likely to have adverse hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes in the future. It also raises awareness of fatty liver disease related to obesity, representing a significant health challenge in the Arab region. Professional societies and multi-stakeholder groups released further position statements on redefining fatty liver over the past few years. Although the prevalence of MAFLD has been roughly matched to that of NAFLD, it is somewhat greater because its definition considers the presence of other liver disorders. The new term for MAFLD is only a name change; patients with fatty liver will eventually need to be categorized and appropriately managed.

The term MAFLD is closely related to other highly prevalent metabolic diseases overlapping in public health. This requires the interaction of many specialties in a multi-disciplinary team (including collaboration between endocrinologists, cardiologists, nutritionists, and liver specialists) to prevent, manage, and follow up on these diseases.

Further studies are required to confirm the acceptability and applicability of this novel terminology in specific geographical regions and its potential role in moving the field forward. This change requires extensive collaboration between local scientific societies, governments, organizations, and other stakeholders through a careful exchange of ideas to guide decision-making from a clinical perspective, taking into considering changes and preparing for them. Finally, future discussions and expert opinions should focus on updating the guidance statements to direct international agencies for drug development.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328-57.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Méndez-Sánchez N, Díaz-Orozco L, Córdova-Gallardo J. Redefinition of fatty liver disease from NAFLD to MAFLD raised disease awareness: Mexican experience. J Hepatol 2021;75:221-2.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med 2018;24:908-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Eslam M, George J. Genetic contributions to NAFLD: Leveraging shared genetics to uncover systems biology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;17:40-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Fouad Y, Waked I, Bollipo S, Gomaa A, Ajlouni Y, Attia D. What's in a name? Renaming 'NAFLD' to 'MAFLD'. Liver Int 2020;40:1254-61.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Blonsky JJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C virus-partners in crime. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:855-65.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mehta M, Satsangi S, Duseja A, Taneja S, Dhiman RK, Chawla Y. Can alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease co-exist? J Clin Exp Hepatol 2017;7:121-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rabie M, Shaker NM, Gaber E. Prevalence updates of substance use among Egyptian adolescents. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 2020;27:4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Yilmaz Y, Byrne CD, Musso G. A single-letter change in an acronym: Signals, reasons, promises, challenges, and steps ahead for moving from NAFLD to MAFLD. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;1-8. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1860019.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol 2020;73:202-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lin S, Huang J, Wang M, Kumar R, Liu Y, Liu S, et al. Comparison of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in real world. Liver Int 2020;40:2082-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Alem SA, Gaber Y, Abdalla M, Said E, Fouad Y. Capturing patient experience: A qualitative study of change from NAFLD to MAFLD real-time feedback. J Hepatol 2021;74:1261-2.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fouad Y, Gomaa A, Semida N, Ghany WA, Attia D. Change from NAFLD to MAFLD increases the awareness of fatty liver disease in primary care physicians and specialists. J Hepatol 2021;74:1254-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Clayton M, Fabrellas N, Luo J, Alghamdi MG, Hafez A, Qadiri TA, et al. From NAFLD to MAFLD: Nurse and allied health perspective. Liver Int 2021;41:683-91.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Valencia-Rodríguez A, Vera-Barajas A, Chávez-Tapia NC, Uribe M, Méndez-Sánchez N. Looking into a new era for the approach of metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol 2020;19:227-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Targher G. Concordance between MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in 'real-world' data. Liver Int 2020;40:2879-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Angelico F, Daniele P, Del Ben M. Impact of the new metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) on NAFLD patients classification in Italy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:2683-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh. 2021.02.015.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tomah S, Hamdy O, Abuelmagd MM, Hassan AH, Alkhouri N, Al-Badri MR, et al. prevalence of and risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and fibrosis among young adults in Egypt. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021;8:e000780.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
ZakiME, Ezzat W, Elhosary YA, Saleh OM. Factors associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese adolescents. Maced J Med Sci 2013;6:273-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Alswat K, Aljumah AA, Sanai FM, Abaalkhail F, Alghamdi M, Al Hamoudi WK, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease burden-Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, 2017-2030. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2018;24:211-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Kronfol NM. Access and barriers to health care delivery in Arab countries: A review.East Mediterr Health J 2012;18:1239-46.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Golzarand M, Mirmiran P, Jessri M, Toolabi K, Mojarrad M, Azizi F. Dietary trends in the Middle East and North Africa: An ecological study (1961 to 2007). Public Health Nutr 2012;15:1835-44.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Inoue Y, Qin B, Poti J, Sokol R, Gordon-Larsen P. Epidemiology of obesity in adults: Latest trends. Curr Obes Rep 2018;7:276-88.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:1077-86.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Alzaman N, Ali A. Obesity and diabetes mellitus in the Arab world. J TaibahUniv Med Sci 2016;11:301-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res ClinPract 2019;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres. 2019.107843.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Al-Rubeaan K, Al-Manaa HA, Khoja TA, Ahmad NA, Al-Sharqawi AH, Siddiqui K, et al. Epidemiology of abnormal glucose metabolism in a country facing its epidemic: SAUDI-DM study. J Diabetes 2015;7:622-32.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Radwan S, Gilfillan D, Eklund B, Radwan HM, El Menofy NG, Lee J, et al. A comparative study of the gut microbiome in Egyptian patients with type I and type II diabetes. PLoS One 2020;15:e0238764.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Eslam M, Valenti L, Romeo S. Genetics and epigenetics of NAFLD and NASH: Clinical impact. J Hepatol 2018;68:268-79.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Younossi Z, Tacke F, Arrese M, Chander Sharma B, Mostafa I, Bugianesi E, et al. Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2019;69:2672-82.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Fouad Y, Esmat G, Elwakil R, Zakaria S, Yosry A, Waked I, et al. The egyptian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022;28:3-20.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
32.
Iacobini C, Pugliese G, BlasettiFantauzzi C, Federici M, Menini S. Metabolically healthy versus metabolically unhealthy obesity. Metabolism 2019;92:51-60.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Duseja A, Taneja S. Changing nomenclature from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease-not only premature but also confusing. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2021;11:278-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Singh SP, Anirvan P, Reddy KR, Conjeevaram HS, Marchesini G, Rinella ME, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Not time for an obituary just yet! J Hepatol 2021;74:972-4.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Younossi ZM, Rinella ME, Sanyal AJ, Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Goodman Z, et al. From NAFLD to MAFLD: Implications of a premature change in terminology. Hepatology 2021;73:1194-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Prof. Mohamed El-Kassas
Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, AinHelwan - 11795, Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_314_22

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1053    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded83    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal